Jump to content

Con-70 Filling Tips Help Please, Pilot Custom Heritage Posting Nib


Intellidepth

Recommended Posts

I have a uni exam in just over a week and will be trialling my Pilot custom heritage posting nib fp under real exam conditions (yes, I'm practicing with it, it's my favourite uni pen).

 

When I refill, or try to, it the converter hardly fills. When it does, it's full of air bubbles. What am I doing wrong please? Or is there some trick I should know?

 

Seems to be writing fine, but I want maximum ink in that converter for the exam (3 hrs of writing). I've already figured out I can't fill the converter separately without the section/nib unit attached to eliminate bubbles like I can with Lamy converters. :(

 

Details: I finished an Iroshizuku ink blend, rinsed converter and section/nib unit with lots of distilled water (that con-70 is a pest to get clean!) shook out water vigorously, dried it off a bit, and put in Sailor Blue Black (apparently permanent) with a manuf date of May 2008 (bought new at full RRP just a couple of weeks ago from a retail fp store in Brisbane, Aus.) Sailor Blue Black is going to be the everyday ongoing ink for this pen.

 

Thanks!

Noodler's Konrad Acrylics (normal+Da Luz custom flex) ~ Lamy AL-Stars/Vista F/M/1.1 ~ Handmade Barry Roberts Dayacom M ~ Waterman 32 1/2, F semi-flex nib ~ Conklin crescent, EF super-flex ~ Aikin Lambert dip pen EEF super-flex ~ Aikin Lambert dip pen semi-flex M ~ Jinhao X450s ~ Pilot Custom Heritage 912 Posting Nib ~ Sailor 1911 Profit 21k Rhodium F. Favourite inks: Iroshizuku blends, Noodler's CMYK blends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Frank C

    3

  • Algester

    3

  • Intellidepth

    3

  • dan212

    3

 

Good luck for the exam.

 

 

 

~Epic

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1348/557449480_2f02cc3cbb_m.jpg http://null.aleturo.com/Dumatborlon/Badges/5EH4/letter.png
 
A sincere man am I
From the land where palm trees grow,
And I want before I die
My soul's verses to bestow.
 
All those moments will be lost in time.
Like tears in rain.
Time to die.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ahhh Sailor inks and the COn-70 arent the best of friends yes its normal you will get a lot of bubbles but I find out Iroshizuku Take-Sumi flows good inside the converter as I see it swirling inside the converter as you use up the ink but you will have problems with the "thicker" inks which is where Sailor normally falls under

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Algester. I was after a permanent ink... Didn't realise it was thicker.

Thanks Lord Epic, will look at that now. Edit: apparently I need to be quick with that button, not slow and cautious. Will empty it tomorrow and try again. Thank you :)

Edited by Intellidepth

Noodler's Konrad Acrylics (normal+Da Luz custom flex) ~ Lamy AL-Stars/Vista F/M/1.1 ~ Handmade Barry Roberts Dayacom M ~ Waterman 32 1/2, F semi-flex nib ~ Conklin crescent, EF super-flex ~ Aikin Lambert dip pen EEF super-flex ~ Aikin Lambert dip pen semi-flex M ~ Jinhao X450s ~ Pilot Custom Heritage 912 Posting Nib ~ Sailor 1911 Profit 21k Rhodium F. Favourite inks: Iroshizuku blends, Noodler's CMYK blends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took me forever to realize going slow doesn't work with these converters. Fast pumps gets the best fill.

PAKMAN

minibanner.gif                                    

        My Favorite Pen Restorer                                            

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sailor Blue Black is one of my favorite inks, at the moment at least. I've found the Sailor ink bottles to be a little shallow to fill my CH91 with CON-70 easily, even with the plastic insert Sailor uses. Putting the ink in an ink sample vial has made it a lot easier because I can submerge the nib deeper. There are still a few very small bubbles but I think that's inevitable with the CON-70.

 

IB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fast pumps gets the best fill.

Yep. Fast stroke with a pause at the top & bottom to allow movement of ink and air.

 

I've found the Sailor ink bottles to be a little shallow to fill my CH91 with CON-70 easily, even with the plastic insert Sailor uses. Putting the ink in an ink sample vial has made it a lot easier because I can submerge the nib deeper.

I've found this to be the case also. Sailor's shallow bottles are nice and stable stable, but hinder more than they help for filling IME.

 

The other thing to check is that the converter is fully seated on the nipple. The Pilot converters will feel secure before they're fully seated and sealed. Give it a good shove to be sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I recently purchased all the Deep Dark Inks from Cult Pens in the UK. I took my handful of Pilot Custom 74 Demonstrators to test them. Two of the converters just didn't fill. I thought that I would have to rebuild them as in this topic:

 

https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/topic/236385-pilot-con-70-disasssembly-some-pics/

 

I watched Lord Epic's post of Brian Goulet on the Con-70. In the past,I had never really paid much attention to how I pressed the plunger to fill the converters. This time I did it quickly; I even said, "BAM" a few times. I kept pressing until I no longer heard bubbles gurgling. Both of the balky converters were filled to the brim. There were a few micro-bubbles in one of the converters, but that doesn't really matter.

 

Thank you all for helping me with this. I am still looking for an excuse to take apart, i.e. "ruin", one of my Con-70 converters.

"One can not waste time worrying about small minds . . . If we were normal, we'd still be using free ball point pens." —Bo Bo Olson

 

"I already own more ink than a rational person can use in a lifetime." —Waski_the_Squirrel

 

I'm still trying to figure out how to list all my pens down here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I guess that I may be weak of heart. I have been avoiding taking one of my Con-70s apart.

"One can not waste time worrying about small minds . . . If we were normal, we'd still be using free ball point pens." —Bo Bo Olson

 

"I already own more ink than a rational person can use in a lifetime." —Waski_the_Squirrel

 

I'm still trying to figure out how to list all my pens down here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I guess I'll have to go get a couple of con 70s out of the trash. I couldn't get them to work, so I threw them in the trash. Then I thought, I'll ask this question. Then I figured that this very question has already been asked. I was right, it has. Thanx for posting the vid, Lord Epic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Thank you all for helping me with this. I am still looking for an excuse to take apart, i.e. "ruin", one of my Con-70 converters.

 

That excuse will happen as soon as you want to change inks. The CON-70 is a huge pain to clean as ink travels up that thin metal tube into the area behind the plunger. As soon as you think it's clean more ink will come down into the main chamber. I've given up using the CON-70 in my Falcon as that's a pen I try new inks with so each fill is a different ink and it takes far too long to clean all traces of the previous ink out.

Toodle pip<BR><BR><BR>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That excuse will happen as soon as you want to change inks. The CON-70 is a huge pain to clean as ink travels up that thin metal tube into the area behind the plunger. As soon as you think it's clean more ink will come down into the main chamber. I've given up using the CON-70 in my Falcon as that's a pen I try new inks with so each fill is a different ink and it takes far too long to clean all traces of the previous ink out.

 

For the most part, I am a one ink, one pen, person. I do have a couple of stained CON-70s, but I just put in either the same ink or a similar color ink, and don't worry about it, too much. I have tried to unscrew the CON-70, without any success. I think that a heat gun would be the next step—I just haven't taken it, yet.

"One can not waste time worrying about small minds . . . If we were normal, we'd still be using free ball point pens." —Bo Bo Olson

 

"I already own more ink than a rational person can use in a lifetime." —Waski_the_Squirrel

 

I'm still trying to figure out how to list all my pens down here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The pen worked wonderfully for the exam and the quick fill technique halved the bubbles. Thank you. It lasted the 3 hour hand-written exam too which was great. It had the perfect nib (posting) on it as the people who prepared the papers didn't leave enough space for us to handwrite our answers even in tiny writing . The posting nib meant I could write up around the edges of their questions lol.

Noodler's Konrad Acrylics (normal+Da Luz custom flex) ~ Lamy AL-Stars/Vista F/M/1.1 ~ Handmade Barry Roberts Dayacom M ~ Waterman 32 1/2, F semi-flex nib ~ Conklin crescent, EF super-flex ~ Aikin Lambert dip pen EEF super-flex ~ Aikin Lambert dip pen semi-flex M ~ Jinhao X450s ~ Pilot Custom Heritage 912 Posting Nib ~ Sailor 1911 Profit 21k Rhodium F. Favourite inks: Iroshizuku blends, Noodler's CMYK blends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...
On 5/20/2015 at 8:15 AM, Notgatherox said:

 

 

Good luck for the exam.

 

 

 

~Epic

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got a Pilot 743 and my first CON-70.. Seems really easy to fill. If anything easier than other converters that require some dexterity to roll the filler. Easy.. A vacuum filler converter.

 

With the Pilot/823, you need to release pressure by unscrewing the back so that ink flows to the nib (great if you are a frequent flier).

You DO NOT need to do this same with the CON-70 filler which is also a vacuum fill.

 

My question: HOW COME?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dan212 said:

My question: HOW COME?

 

Because you're mistaken:

 

2 hours ago, dan212 said:

With the Pilot/823, you need to release pressure by unscrewing the back

 

That doesn't release pressure inside the ink reservoir. It physically unseals the ink reservoir so that there is direct pathway for ink to flow from the reservoir into the feed.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, A Smug Dill said:

 

Because you're mistaken:

 

 

That doesn't release pressure inside the ink reservoir. It physically unseals the ink reservoir so that there is direct pathway for ink to flow from the reservoir into the feed.

😀 LOL - Yes you are right. Duh.. I hadn't thought through how the plumbing in the 823 is so different  compared to the converter. Thanks!!

Edited by dan212
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35347
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30428
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...