Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In 1959, the Montblanc line was redisigned, 142, 144 and 146 are retired, instead Montblanc was offering:


Meisterstück:
12 (plastic, looked a bit like the Parker 45 and had a triangular capband)
14 (plastic, see above)
72 (with rolled gold cap)
74 (with rolled gold cap)
82 (with rolled gold cap and barrel)
84 (with rolled gold cap and barrel)
92 (in 14 carat solid gold cap and barrel)
94 (in 14 carat solid gold cap and barrel)

Medium range:
22 (with 14 ct gold nib and two cap rings)
24 (with 14 ct gold nib and two cap rings)

Economy:
32 (with 14 ct gold nib and one cap ring)
34 (with 14 ct gold nib and one cap ring)
31 (with steel nib)
32S (with steel nib, silver clip and cap ring)
34S (with steel nib, silver clip and cap ring)
31D (with "manifold" nib)
32P (cartridge filling system)
34P (cartridge filling system)

 

The Montblanc '34', first '3' stand for Economy Range, and the second '4' stand for large size, while '2' stand for standard size.

 

Here is how to disassemble the piston and nib for this series (12/14/22/24/32/34):

 

1. First step, unscrew the hood:

 

35726600865_4a4fa0ec77_o.jpg

 

2. Front and back shot of the nib&hood:

35726605665_dca1c59da4_k.jpg

35595145101_025e2cdc1e_k.jpg

3. Now disassemble the nib&hood, also the piston:

35595187801_ddc9e2433b_k.jpg

4. The section actually are made from 2 parts

35595149731_3711e35380_k.jpg

35726609695_a94498e0cb_k.jpg

34916818153_76698695fc_k.jpg

5. This is how the hood looks like:

34916832853_347eb10fac_k.jpg

6. Notice that the ink window can be disassembled, too:

35595141301_ca41b7e4d3_k.jpg

35595166121_66679e60cf_k.jpg

35595180351_b7a2ebfe36_k.jpg

7. Here is how the piston looks like, you need to heat the back end of the pen to pull it off:

34916822483_e0eee61703_k.jpg

35595171101_61197cc53c_k.jpg

8. This is a look at the beatiful14K Gold "Intarsia" :

35595157441_5ee839aa0b_k.jpg

9. Finally, you can find the 34/32/24/22/14/12 on the cap trim:

34916819783_e133ef5859_k.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • jhsd1124013561

    9

  • kpong11

    2

  • Wolverine1

    1

  • Chrissy

    1

Thanks for nice demonstration, however could you please give some tips to remove intrasia nib from the section?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your post. The folks on the Montblanc forum would also like it, so, is there a chance that you could post this on the Montblanc sub-forum too?

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for nice demonstration, however could you please give some tips to remove intrasia nib from the section?

I have heard multiple times from my friends that the Montblanc 32/34's plastic quality is not as good as 12/14 since the 3 series is economy line.

 

So please proceed with caution, you need to push the feed out, please be adviced that the nib will stay on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your post. The folks on the Montblanc forum would also like it, so, is there a chance that you could post this on the Montblanc sub-forum too?

Thank you.

Sure thing! I will add the Montblanc 22 to compare the differences and post a more detailed post :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard multiple times from my friends that the Montblanc 32/34's plastic quality is not as good as 12/14 since the 3 series is economy line.

 

So please proceed with caution, you need to push the feed out, please be adviced that the nib will stay on.

So the nib and feed are not fit together in clear plastic housing as in wing type?, btw many thanks for your caution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the nib and feed are not fit together in clear plastic housing as in wing type?, btw many thanks for your caution.

Not a problem :)

 

The butterfly (wing) nib, the nib can be fitted into the clear plastic feed housing, but 32/34, the nib cannot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great presentation. This will go in my archive of pen repair tips. I'm sure that I'm not alone. This pictorial will be kept by many. Thanks for all the work you put into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great presentation. This will go in my archive of pen repair tips. I'm sure that I'm not alone. This pictorial will be kept by many. Thanks for all the work you put into it.

Thanks so much for the kind words :)

 

The Montblanc 12/14/22/24/32/34 series really fascinated me, I am writing a summary report for it and will present to Montblanc Forum this weekend :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent! How exactly do you take off the piston though? Do you unscrew it full and then yank it out, or keep it in the closed position and then pull?

Do you just pull after heating, or does it unscrew?

 

Thanks

My Restoration Notes Website--> link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent! How exactly do you take off the piston though? Do you unscrew it full and then yank it out, or keep it in the closed position and then pull?

Do you just pull after heating, or does it unscrew?

 

Thanks

I don't recommend fully unscrew the piston, I would only unscrew the piston only a little bit. I will explain this in my next post, keep tuned :P

 

Also, heat first.

Edited by jhsd1124013561
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for your post. The folks on the Montblanc forum would also like it, so, is there a chance that you could post this on the Montblanc sub-forum too?

Thank you.

 

I have finished the a post for the whole serie, you can find it in Montblanc forum now, hope the post will serve people well :)

 

https://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/topic/326283-a-thorough-report-on-montblanc-121422243234-series/?do=findComment&comment=3900844

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30441
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...