Jump to content

Piston Filler Comparison (M600, Lamy 2000, Pilot Ch92, Twsbi)


maverick777

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the great review.

 

My Pilot CH92 FM (with Waterman Serenity Blue ink) writes about the same line width was Pelikan M200 F (with Peilikan 4001 Royal Blue ink). However, CH92 is much wetter - may be because Waterman is a wet ink(?).

 

Your TWSBI writing samples show 580 EF got thicker lines than 580 F - which is a bit odd. TWSBI got quality control issues in their nib sizes?

I kind of noticed that too. Maybe because of the ink? Perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • maverick777

    5

  • RNHC

    2

  • OakIris

    2

  • Algester

    2

 

Congrats on the new pen. I have read that Japanese mediums run about as wide as a western medium and sometimes this catches people off guard since the F and XF nibs are so much finer than western nibs. It's another reason I haven't purchased a Sailor pen. I want to get their MF nib, but it's offered in a very limited range of pens. Japanese FM is my ideal nib size for Japanese pens. Pelikan XF and Pilot FM is pretty much identical in line width.

I don't own any CH92, but I wish I did. However, I have two Metropolitan M and they're slightly finer than my Lamy AL-star F. Isn't the nib width the same for Metropolitan and CH92?

YNWA - JFT97

 

Instagram: inkyandy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35569
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31303
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Blog Comments

    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • alkman
      There is still chemistry for processing regular chrome (positive) films like Kodak Ektachrome and Fuji Velvia, but Kodachrome was a completely different and multistep beast. 
    • Ceilidh
      Ah, but how to get it processed - that is the question. I believe that the last machine able to run K-14 (Kodachrome processing) ceased to operate some 15 or so years ago. Perhaps the film will be worth something as a curiosity in my estate sale when I die. 😺
    • Mercian
      Take a lot of photos!   If the film has deteriorated or 'gone off' in any way, you can use that as a 'feature' to take 'arty' pictures - whether of landmarks, or people, or whatever.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...