Jump to content

Balance Lever Fill Disassembly Question


Addertooth

Recommended Posts

I snagged a couple Balance pens which are lever fill. Both are white dot, one with Feather nib, the other with Lifetime nib.

The quick question is whether the Section is a friction fit in the barrel, or a threaded assembly like some of the later pens which are piston fill (which have Triumph nib).

 

Pictures of pens:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Addertooth

    5

  • Ron Z

    1

  • pen lady

    1

Friction fit as far as I can remember. Nice sturdy pens, but you're in the wrong forum, all the Waterman people are going '' :yikes: . Best of luck.

Edited by pen lady
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, my bad, I had too many windows open in different groups, and lost track. First world problems... collecting too many brands of fountain pens ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the confirmation Ron Z. I am mid-restore on a desk pen Sheaffer Vacu fill pen, and after looking at these lever fill pens, I had a "it can't possibly be that easy on a Sheaffer" moment.

Picture of the vacu pen carnage... waiting on seals.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a better picture of the pens. They are actually green striated, from the seller's photo, I thought they were brown striated.

The original picture was a bit unclear, I was glad to see they had the translucent sections.

In the picture left to right, lever pen with Lifetime nib, Lever pen with the Feather nib, Tuckaway Mechanical pencil in striated brown, and Tuckaway Vacu fill pen with Triumph nib.

The two new lever filled pens are only slightly bigger than the Tuckaway pencil and pen.

 

(Pictures make every story better, except perhaps C-Section stories).

Edited by Addertooth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the use of a hair dryer to heat the body/section junction, both pens came apart. I fabricated a feed punch with a 3/16th wooden dowel, which was shaved down about 20 thousandths. Then a groove was cut out of the wooden punch so the tube extending from the feed would not be damaged. The feed was tapped out after a brief soak of the section/feed/nib. Those last three parts were put in the ultrasonic cleaner to prepare them for being put back into service. A new number 16 sac was fitted to each of the sections, and will cure overnight before being assembled into a complete pen in the morning. Post Edit Note: A number 18 sac would have fit too.

 

Pictures:

Edited by Addertooth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35333
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30409
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...