Jump to content

Aurora Bb (Double Broad) Nib Experience?


gmax

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I'm considering an Aurora BB nib, and would love to heard from anyone with experience of using them.

 

I am hoping for something stubbish, giving some line variation but not quite as much as a true stub, since the narrower line width does not suit my forward-slanting writing, particularly as the Aurora stub has no tipping material!

 

Can anyone please confirm if current Aurora BB nibs are stubbish? A writing sample would be fabulous, especially one comparing stub and BB writing :)

Edited by gmax

✒️ :happyberet:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Sazerac

    4

  • gmax

    3

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes. I have one on an Optima, and it is slightly stubbish.

 

I'll get around to sending a writing sample tomorrow, but my pen might not represent a factory-fresh nib accurately because I had John Mottishaw add some flex to it. It came stiff as a nail and stubbish -- not quite what I like, but now it is a slightly flexy, slightly stubbish nib that is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Sazerac :)

 

A writing sample would be much appreciated, especially if it could include a comparison with other nib widths.

✒️ :happyberet:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay. Work got busy. Also, this is a kind of crummy shot with my iPad camera. You can see that the Aurora BB is quite broad, and without the softening and flexing by J. Mottishaw would have just as crisp line variation as the Delta.

post-2002-0-42747200-1466094208_thumb.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, here is one more with a more standard Delta Broad. It's a mid-90s "Millenium" broad nib, which I have found run narrower than Detla nibs today.

post-2002-0-66992000-1466095080_thumb.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you - I really appreciate your taking the time to do this. Having seen this comparison, I'm fairly sure that the stubbish character of the BB nib would be a better fit for me than a proper stub.

 

Now to work out the funding :rolleyes:

 

Thanks once again.

✒️ :happyberet:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're welcome.

 

Had I not been on a flexing kick, I would have left the Aurora BB in its factory condition as the BB is quite stubbish but not as sharp as a stub or italic. Also, I have two OBB Aurora nibs in reserve (so to speak), so flexing the BB seemed like a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35328
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30398
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...