Jump to content

[Resolved]Sailor Highace Neo Vs Penmanship Vs Kakuno: Budget Fine Nibs.


rcazador

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

I've finally stumbled on a local site that stocks some Pilots and Sailors. As someone who prefers fine writing pens, I've picked out the Sailor HighAce Neo -F, Sailor Clear Candy-F, Pilot Penmanship -XF and Pilot Kakuno -F. My first choice was the the Penmanship but reviews are contradictory, while I'm all for super fine Japanese FPs on a budget it has to be usable and not dreadfully scratchy. Sailors have a reputation of lines finer than Pilot so the High Ace should be good. There are of this FP few reviews all of which place it as a good pen - seems like a safe bet -, but the lack of widespread awareness about it is worrying. The Kakuno and Clear Candy are Japanese, so I guess their fine nibs should be a pretty thin line, but with their marketing focus on kids, I'm not sure if its really in the same league as the others.

So guys please pitch in with your real world experience.

Thanks again.

 

PS. they dont stock the 78G or Metro, so those aren't an option right now.

Edited by rcazador
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rcazador

    2

  • hot cocoa

    1

  • theolu

    1

  • madden11

    1

I've only used the penmanship and high ace neo. I think foe daily use and carry the Sailor is more practical as it has a more conventional form. The penmanship doesn't have a clip and is a bit of an odd design. I only bought it for the nib which I put on my metropolitan. Between the nibs I also prefer the Sailor, it's smoother and ever so slightly wider.

Edited by theolu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Highace Neo has a great nib and HORRIBLE cheap plastic barrel. Had one break in transit to me, and the other break just in daily use. So, I can't recommend it, good nib notwithstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The High- Ace was the second pen I bought, and after that I was more careful in my selections. There is cheap and there is inexpensive. This pen is just cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only used the penmanship and high ace neo. I think foe daily use and carry the Sailor is more practical as it has a more conventional form. The penmanship doesn't have a clip and is a bit of an odd design. I only bought it for the nib which I put on my metropolitan. Between the nibs I also prefer the Sailor, it's smoother and ever so slightly wider.

 

 

The Highace Neo has a great nib and HORRIBLE cheap plastic barrel. Had one break in transit to me, and the other break just in daily use. So, I can't recommend it, good nib notwithstanding.

 

 

The High- Ace was the second pen I bought, and after that I was more careful in my selections. There is cheap and there is inexpensive. This pen is just cheap.

 

Thanks guys. Seems I picked the wrong set of beginner Fines. For now I'll stick to Heros and look out for a Metro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The neo barrel is pretty cheap but it's not too terrible. It has survived a good deal abuse in my pockets and in my book bag. It's one of the pens I just toss in and don't think about it twice. I like how securely the pen posts, and I like that it's light weight. Also the nib is pretty good, and in my experience, better than the Pilot Metropolitan/78G nib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30436
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...