Jump to content

1965 OMAS Catalogue


gicoteni

Recommended Posts

Hello. I have found another vintage OMAS catalogue: the 1965 one. You can see a lot of models of the mythical 361, the 555 - 556 - 557 pens and the production of Minerva, a sub-brand of OMAS.

 

post-4615-1211226050_thumb.jpg

OMAS_CATALOGUE_1965.pdf

This is the link to OMAS catalogues I previously posted.

 

If interested to a better resolution file, send me an email. Saluti a tutti, Giuseppe

Edited by gicoteni
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • gicoteni

    3

  • Michael R.

    1

  • omasfan

    1

  • tipstricks

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Fantastico catalogo, Giuseppe. Grazie per condividerlo con noi!

Wonderful catalog, thank you for sharing!

 

Giampaolo

http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh20/tipstricks_photo/31032009052_cr.jpg - My albums
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff! Thanks for sharing.

As a lover of Omas I am just a bit astonished, though, at their unimaginativeness in those days. All those black boring pens. I think Omas was strongest and most innovative and artistically accomplished during their olden times (30s, 40s) and during their revival of said olden times (resurrection of the celluloids during the 90s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff! Thanks for sharing.

As a lover of Omas I am just a bit astonished, though, at their unimaginativeness in those days. All those black boring pens. I think Omas was strongest and most innovative and artistically accomplished during their olden times (30s, 40s) and during their revival of said olden times (resurrection of the celluloids during the 90s).

 

These looked indeed like the (begining of the) Middle-Ages for Omas.

 

Thanks for sharing this beautiful catalog. Learning about fountain pen history is the greatest pleasure in the hobby, right after writing.

Edited by RedRob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love those older Omas catalogs. I only have a few but what great fun to peruse.

Many thanks.

 

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff! Thanks for sharing.

As a lover of Omas I am just a bit astonished, though, at their unimaginativeness in those days. All those black boring pens. I think Omas was strongest and most innovative and artistically accomplished during their olden times (30s, 40s) and during their revival of said olden times (resurrection of the celluloids during the 90s).

 

 

Yes, I agree with you it was not the best period of OMAS production: anyhow I prefer those plain black pens to some contemporary over-elaborate odd LE models. Ciao, G.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankyou for posting, I prefer the look of the 1960s vintage OMAS over what is being made now by a long shot.

"Life moves pretty fast, if you do not stop and look around once and a while you might just miss it."

Ferris Bueller

 

 

 

Bill Smith's Photography

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having looked at the catalog, I would compare the OMAS production of that era to the Sheaffer and Parker pens of the same period. Not very flashy or decorative, but eminently usable. Some of the pens like the CS, VS, and 361 owe a lot to the design of pens like the PFM and the Parker "61." Personally, I find this design aesthetic produces much more durable and usable pens. Not to say I don't love my Royale Blue Paragon, but most of my daily users are 1950's Sheaffers. It is interesting to see the dot marker and the arrow marker on the different sections of some of the new-style pens; definitely reminders of the White Dot and the Parker "61" section marker!

 

Having said that, I think this catalog offers many more size and style choices than contemporary American companies, even though the colors seem somewhat limited. Heck, there are even celluloids - which of course Sheaffer wasn't using in 1965!

 

Best,

Summer Greer

Edited by Martius

"Can I see Arcturus from where I stand?" -RPW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having looked at the catalog, I would compare the OMAS production of that era to the Sheaffer and Parker pens of the same period. Not very flashy or decorative, but eminently usable. Some of the pens like the CS, VS, and 361 owe a lot to the design of pens like the PFM and the Parker "61." Personally, I find this design aesthetic produces much more durable and usable pens. Not to say I don't love my Royale Blue Paragon, but most of my daily users are 1950's Sheaffers. It is interesting to see the dot marker and the arrow marker on the different sections of some of the new-style pens; definitely reminders of the White Dot and the Parker "61" section marker!

 

Having said that, I think this catalog offers many more size and style choices than contemporary American companies, even though the colors seem somewhat limited. Heck, there are even celluloids - which of course Sheaffer wasn't using in 1965!

 

Best,

Summer Greer

Interesting post. In my opinion symbols in 361 and CS were introduced to point out the double use of the nib: flex and rigid if rounded (the V on one side and the I on the other). It was not a decorative matter from other pens: 361 was first produced 1948, while 61 is by 1956 and PFM by 1959.

Ciao, Giuseppe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35652
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31610
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...