Jump to content

Question on rollerball refills (Lamy/Schmidt)


Puschel

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have a Lamy 2000 rollerball and a question on the refills. The current Lamy M63 refills are relabeled Schmidt SCR 5888 with a different endcap. The older Lamy M62 refills were relabeled Schmidt SRF 367.

 

The M63 do write very good but the line varies over the (short) life of the refill. The first 2 pages are very wet and the line featheres a bit (even on Clairefontaine pupitre). The following 10 pages are simply perfect: supersmooth, not to wet, not to dry, no skipping, no feathering at all. Afterwards the line still looks ok but writing feels a bit scratchy and dry. Here and there the refill skips and generally more pressure is needed. This goes on for maybe 8 pages before it gets totally unacceptable. When you then open the refill with a knife the tampon indeed looks very dry but wring it out and there are still some drops of ink in it. It seems to be impossible to use such refills entirely up.

 

The Schmidt SRF 367 (Lamy M62) seems to be much better in this regard and should give a constant line over its life. The problem is that not one webshop here in Germany sells them (the old Lamy M62 are long discontinued). Maybe Schmidt isn't allowed to sell its original refills here in Germany - I don't know.

 

Does anyone know why Lamy changed the refills? Was there a problem with the old M62? I have no opportunity to test them but might order from abroad if they are indeed much better. Can someone write a short review of the Lamy M62 / Schmidt SRF 367, please?

 

Thanks

 

 

Puschel

Edited by Puschel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DeSuisse

    2

  • Puschel

    2

  • gregoron

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello,

 

I have a Lamy 2000 rollerball and a question on the refills. The current Lamy M63 refills are relabeled Schmidt SCR 5888 with a different endcap. The older Lamy M62 refills were relabeled Schmidt SRF 367.

 

The M63 do write very good but the line varies over the (short) life of the refill. The first 2 pages are very wet and the line featheres a bit (even on Clairefontaine pupitre). The following 10 pages are simply perfect: supersmooth, not to wet, not to dry, no skipping, no feathering at all. Afterwards the line still looks ok but writing feels a bit scratchy and dry. Here and there the refill skips and generally more pressure is needed. This goes on for maybe 8 pages before it gets totally unacceptable. When you then open the refill with a knife the tampon indeed looks very dry but wring it out and there are still some drops of ink in it. It seems to be impossible to use such refills entirely up.

 

The Schmidt SRF 367 (Lamy M62) seems to be much better in this regard and should give a constant line over its life. The problem is that not one webshop here in Germany sells them (the old Lamy M62 are long discontinued). Maybe Schmidt isn't allowed to sell its original refills here in Germany - I don't know.

 

Does anyone know why Lamy changed the refills? Was there a problem with the old M62? I have no opportunity to test them but might order from abroad if they are indeed much better. Can someone write a short review of the Lamy M62 / Schmidt SRS 367, please?

 

Thanks

 

 

Puschel

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I have a Lamy 2000 rollerball and a question on the refills. The current Lamy M63 refills are relabeled Schmidt SCR 5888 with a different endcap. The older Lamy M62 refills were relabeled Schmidt SRF 367.

 

The M63 do write very good but the line varies over the (short) life of the refill. The first 2 pages are very wet and the line featheres a bit (even on Clairefontaine pupitre). The following 10 pages are simply perfect: supersmooth, not to wet, not to dry, no skipping, no feathering at all. Afterwards the line still looks ok but writing feels a bit scratchy and dry. Here and there the refill skips and generally more pressure is needed. This goes on for maybe 8 pages before it gets totally unacceptable. When you then open the refill with a knife the tampon indeed looks very dry but wring it out and there are still some drops of ink in it. It seems to be impossible to use such refills entirely up.

 

The Schmidt SRF 367 (Lamy M62) seems to be much better in this regard and should give a constant line over its life. The problem is that not one webshop here in Germany sells them (the old Lamy M62 are long discontinued). Maybe Schmidt isn't allowed to sell its original refills here in Germany - I don't know.

 

Does anyone know why Lamy changed the refills? Was there a problem with the old M62? I have no opportunity to test them but might order from abroad if they are indeed much better. Can someone write a short review of the Lamy M62 / Schmidt SRS 367, please?

 

Thanks

 

 

Puschel

In Swizerland there is always the Lamy M62 which write very good. We can't find other refill for lamy rollerball.

I hope you will find also one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very positive the M62 got discontinued. Lamy doesn't have it on its site anymore. I ordered some M62 at a German webshop but they sent me M63.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Swisherpens still have them. You could also refill this cartridge with your favorite bottled ink using an ink syringe or eye-dropper. I did this on my M66 refill.

 

I'm very positive the M62 got discontinued. Lamy doesn't have it on its site anymore. I ordered some M62 at a German webshop but they sent me M63.

 

 

You are what you write

More than you are what you say

But, do more than write

(my haiku)

 

-----------------------------------

 

- No affiliation with any vendors or manufacturers mentioned above.

- Edits done for grammatical purposes only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35639
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31564
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...