Jump to content

Bristol24

Recommended Posts

I recently acquired a Parker 21 that, from the photos, gave me the impression that it might actually be a Parker 51 with a '21 cap.  I made that initial judgement via photos over the Internet, not by personal inspection.  What caused me to think it might be a Parker 51 was the clutch ring.  In the photos it looks much like a '51 clutch ring.  The other two 21s that I own both have the clutch spring in the clutch ring itself with no "fingers" or other form of clutch inside the cap other than the inner cap.  This pen's cap has a three fingered "clutch" of some sort and the clutch ring on the barrel is actually below the surfaces of the barrel and shell so the friction to hold the cap in place is between the fingers in the cap and the plastic of the shell.  This pen is obviously un-inked but it has the scratches that would indicate a life getting bumped around in a drawer.  The barrel has no imprint anywhere but the base of the cap shows it being a Parker 21.  While I have not inked the pen, I did "write" with it dry on paper and was impressed with the nib's smoothness.  The cap looks as though it must have had a jewel at some point.  Does anyone have any information about this version of the '21?  If it is, indeed, missing a jewel on the cap, does anyone have an idea where I could find one?

 

Thanks,

 

Cliff

P21-2.jpg

P21-3.jpg

P21-1.jpg

P21-4.jpg

“The only thing most people do better than anyone else is read their own handwriting.”  John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Bristol24

    3

  • bsenn

    2

  • Number99

    2

  • afishhunter

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

12 hours ago, bsenn said:

It appears to be a Super 21. See info here http://www.richardspens.com/ref/profiles/21.htm

 

All the Super 21s I have seen have a convex conical tassie on the cap. Yours is cooler.

 

The clutch ring is plastic.

Yes, I agree that it is a Super 21.  My other two 21s are Supers but have the spring clutch ring and no fingers inside the cap.  They also have the conical tassie you mention.  This cap almost looks as though there should be something in the recess.  Thank you for mentioning Richard's site.  That was the first place I consulted when I got the pen. I've yet to find photos of other 21s like this one and I'm hopeful someone really into Parker 21s will be able to enlighten me.

 

Cliff

“The only thing most people do better than anyone else is read their own handwriting.”  John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick follow up:  I did find photos of other Parker 21s with the same style of cap but the are greatly out numbered by photos of Super 21s with the conical tassie on the cap.  The pen I have must be the last iteration of the Super 21.  Does anyone have information to confirm this?

 

Cliff

“The only thing most people do better than anyone else is read their own handwriting.”  John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a 21 FP with a cap top tassie very similar to this pen in the same lot as the target FP that I won yesterday.

 And that 21 is my first non-junk 21 FP. (or junk…)

 I'm interested in the progression of this thread.

 

 A search of the net revealed a high probability of a 21 Flighter FP having a similar captop tassie.

 

 I learned that on Parker 45s and 75s such cap top tassie were changed to dimpled type to accommodate discs showing medallions, owner's initials, ink color, etc.

 It was around 1970.

 It's very interesting that such a change was made in 21 before this one.

 

 I am looking forward to receiving the pen.

 

 

Edited by Number99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Number99 said:

A search of the net revealed a high probability of a 21 Flighter FP having a similar captop tassie.

 

Thanks for the tip. I checked my 21 flighter and it does have the dimpled tassie.

One test is worth a thousand expert opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received the pen.

 They look the same, but my pen cap has a slightly stronger hairline finish.(It has the same texture as the 45 CT cap.)

 Also, there are 4 finger springs in the inner view of the cap, so it may be a different version.

 

 I came across a discussion page on another pen forum.

 Here are 1959 and 1960 advertisements for the Canadian Super 21.(However, the former may be 1958 because the 61 jet flighter is drawn as a new model.)

 

 The ad is a painted representation, but the cap top tussie looks like a cone, so you can guess that the change has not been made in Canada yet.

 

 Since this type of cap top tassie is also recognized in the 21 Flighter released in 1958 (?), there is a high possibility that this pen is a late version of the Super 21.

 

http://fountainpenboard.com/forum/index.php?/topic/4031-parker-21-queston/

 

If anyone knows please let me know.

 I read that the Super 21 uses an undisclosed plastic material called X-100, which is different from the polystyrene plastic used in the Mark 1 and Mark 2.

 Does this material shrink?

 

https://www.fountainpen.it/Parker_21

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30441
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...