Jump to content

Parker Quink Permanent: iron gall or pigment?


matteob

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this has been asked before but is Quink Permanent iron gall or nano particle based and does one need to take extra precautions like more regular flushing with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • matteob

    2

  • Mr.Rene

    1

  • Mercian

    1

  • arcfide

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

If you are asking about vintage formulations of Quink, I can’t help you.

 

That said, no currently-produced Parker Quink is ‘permanent’.

There used to be a ‘Washable Black’, a ‘Black’, a ‘Washable Blue’, and a ‘Blue’.

The colours that are listed as ‘Washable’ are/were formulated to come out of clothes easily (to prevent dry-cleaning claims from customers).

 

Those that are not listed as ‘Washable’ are e.g. not waterproof, and they may not be very lightfast either. I think that the difference is that they may contain slightly more dye than their ‘Washable’ equivalents, and that Parker therefore doesn’t make any claim that they will come out of clothes easily.

 

I have both types of Blue Quink, and cartridges of Black of various vintages.

I also have some cartridges of the current ‘Blue Black’ Quink.

That’s not water-resistant or lightfast either.

 

large.Mercia45x27IMG_2024-09-18-104147.PNG.4f96e7299640f06f63e43a2096e76b6e.PNG  Foul in clear conditions, but handsome in the fog.  spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh I see on some places there is permanent blue, black and blue black and a washable. That answers my question: thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quink Blue Black Permanent ink was iron gall...but I am talking about old formula 1940-50´s years.

Actual Parker inks are classic dye base formula...

Best Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Mr.Rene Can you provide a source for information about Parker Quink Blue Black ink being IG back in the day? Waterman Blue Black was, and I think Sheaffer was as well, but all my research about Parker's Quink line was that they were dye-based and non-IG from the start (I think they were intentionally positioning themselves against the crop of IG inks of the time, IIUC). I'd be really interested to learn about a Parker Quink IG ink from back in the day. 

 

8 hours ago, matteob said:

Ahhh I see on some places there is permanent blue, black and blue black and a washable. That answers my question: thanks!

 

For a little more detail on this, back in the day, when Parker Quink established its permanent and washable monikers, they were using the concept as it relates to clothing, but also in some respects to paper. The difference is that back then, the standard for permanence was a little different. There were no pigmented inks that were fountain pen safe, and the standard for lightfastness was also quite different. There were many inks that were made over those times that were quite fade-prone. 

 

Parker Quink Black ink today, along with the similarly formulated (but probably not identical) Waterman Black, are both more water resistant than you might initially expect, and they are competitive with other standard black inks in their lightfastness, but they aren't archivally permanent in the way that we often consider today. At the time, permanent inks were held to a lesser standard. Even so, if you only get some water splashed on the page, Parker Black goes blue, rather than fading instantly, while if you expose it to the sun, it goes brown, but not as quickly as some other inks. It's not a bad ink, but it has to be taken for what it is. 

 

The good thing is that it's an exceptionally well-behaved and safe ink in the pen and will treat the internals of your pen quite well. It was one of the first inks that made a big deal about "cleaning while you write" because of the extra additives that kept the ink flowing well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have used a lot of vintage Quink inks (the curved square bottom bottles from the 1940s).  And I have Permanent Royal Blue in a pen at the moment (turns out I have a couple of bottles of the Permanent Blue-Black, but apparently haven't tried it).  I can say that I have seen no evidence of either Permanent Royal Blue or Microfilm Black changing color/fading the way I do with any of the (modern) IG inks I have; ditto for other "permanent" colors of Quink from that era.  

But now you've got me curious.  So I will ink up a pen at some point this week with some of the 1940s-era Permanent Blue-Black and see how it behaves, and report back.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35661
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31652
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...