Jump to content

StandardGraph Cypress Green (Zypressengrün)


Luci

Recommended Posts

This is the fourth in my series of reviews of StandardGraph inks. StandardGraph is a manufacturer of inks and other office accessories in Germany. My collection was purchased at papier kramer in Frankfurt in 2005. 

I have previously reviewed Elder blueOrange and Mallow Red.

This is the driest of the inks so far, and my least favourite. It has not gotten a lot of love in previous reviews by others, and I can see why. It doesn't have the same pleasant flow as, say, Elder Blue, and it is too bright to use for general business writing or correspondence. It is even more fluoro-looking in broader nibs, as the Q-tip test shows, but less offensive in finer nibs, such as in the Parker Vector I have inked with it. It also seems (to my eyes, anyway) a touch lighter fresh out of the bottle than it is after being in the pen for a few weeks. This is not something I've noticed with other colours in this range.

I tend to use this ink for marking up text I'm editing, when I need a contrasting colour for a particular purpose. 

The other inks in the StandardGraph range seem to be a bit more water resistant, or perhaps I was just a bit more heavy-handed with my dabbing drops on the paper this time. 

CypressGreen.thumb.jpeg.9de0f95aab78d3eab45c9d600d971f33.jpeg

 

Scan of the reverse of the review form, to demonstrate show-through. It shows through more than the Elder Blue from the StandardGraph range. It bled through a bit in the Monteverde pen, but I should point out that that is just a tester pen that I'd dipped, rather than coming from the feed. It also doesn't show through on better quality paper such as Semikolon notebook paper. It is possible that the greater show-through was because the copy paper had been affected by all the moisture in the air following the massive rains in New South Wales over the past week. I have pre-printed some review forms and they have been sitting in a plastic sleeve for some weeks.

CypressGreen-reverse.thumb.jpeg.0c842c78c32fa0aad9bc04035545abe0.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Luci

    3

  • lapis

    1

  • chromantic

    1

  • Detman101

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks but no thanks, as they say... I was expecting (from SG's naming) something  more like a fern-green (which they do offer). But this one is a tick too blue and a half a tick too pastel. Sort of a menthol green, more like H's Diabolo Menthe or D's Soft Mint.

Life is too short to drink bad wine (Goethe)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks fo the review Luci. 

As you said, this type of colour is perfect for editing/ correcting texts as opposed to the classic red. 

I like it. 

For writing that's a different story :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Luci - I think I can honestly say that's one of the least desirable inks I've seen in a long time - and your review makes it clear that it has no redeeming features to make up for the colour!

 

Does it look like mouthwash in the bottle as well as on paper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the review and continuing the series. :)  Mark-up does seem like a good use for a bright ink, even though this wouldn't be my color otherwise.  Perhaps someone with a firehose to tame will like its dryness. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2021 at 12:47 AM, mizgeorge said:

Does it look like mouthwash in the bottle as well as on paper?

 

Mouthwash wasn't the first thought that springs to my mind looking at the colour in the bottle (this was remarkably hard to photograph!). But it is quite menthol-like. Quite a few shades darker than Herbin's Diablo de Menthe, one of the inks in the comparison above. It is fair to say that Diablo de Menthe looks like the paler/watered down version of this ink, and to be honest I like Diablo de Menthe even less than this ink. And I have two full bottles of Diablo de Menthe! Anyone in Sydney want to swap one?

mentholbottle.thumb.jpg.8aed1950393a764c1b25986d0e05c260.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2021 at 8:25 PM, vojtahlad said:

In which universe is this a colour of cypress?

In the same universe where really dark purple is (Montblamc) “lavender”? 😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30436
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...