Jump to content

Can You Id This Pen With These Mediocre Pics Only?


Tintafuego

Recommended Posts

OK, boys and girls, guess if you can:

 

My in-law who is far and away from where I now live found this fountain pen in an old box. He is not very good with technology, but still managed to take some pictures of the pen. Only when he comes visit in December I will be able to look at the thing in person (the pen, not my in-law). Do any of you vintage lovers see any mark that could get me closer to finding out the identity of this pen? I will post more images of it in about 30 days when he visits.

post-133420-0-65312100-1542153094_thumb.jpg

post-133420-0-39906800-1542153161_thumb.jpg

post-133420-0-68860300-1542153186_thumb.jpg

post-133420-0-34341400-1542153223_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tintafuego

    2

  • Bo Bo Olson

    1

  • peterg

    1

  • ParramattaPaul

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I am no authority by any stretch of anyone's imagination, but hazarding a guess. It may be a Pelikan, based upon the '500' on the barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a Pelikan, three cap bands, the 500 was not on the pen, in the 500 had a rolled gold piston cap where it would have been. The 500n and 500nn, I don't know where marked but would not be just there and would have been tortoise I would almost bet. It was a flagship pen.

 

Need to see the clip...............could be a Soennecken 500....school pen??? But I didn't find 500 listed in Labrou's book.

 

Ask your father in law what it says on the nib.

The Reality Show is a riveting result of 23% being illiterate, and 60% reading at a 6th grade or lower level.

      Banker's bonuses caused all the inch problems, Metric cures.

Once a bartender, always a bartender.

The cheapest lessons are from those who learned expensive lessons. Ignorance is best for learning expensive lessons.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a Pelikan, three cap bands, the 500 was not on the pen, in the 500 had a rolled gold piston cap where it would have been. The 500n and 500nn, I don't know where marked but would not be just there and would have been tortoise I would almost bet. It was a flagship pen.

 

Need to see the clip...............could be a Soennecken 500....school pen??? But I didn't find 500 listed in Labrou's book.

 

Ask your father in law what it says on the nib.

...and in the diamond next to the 500

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a Pelikan, three cap bands, the 500 was not on the pen, in the 500 had a rolled gold piston cap where it would have been. The 500n and 500nn, I don't know where marked but would not be just there and would have been tortoise I would almost bet. It was a flagship pen.

 

Need to see the clip...............could be a Soennecken 500....school pen??? But I didn't find 500 listed in Labrou's book.

 

Ask your father in law what it says on the nib.

 

...and in the diamond next to the 500

 

This weekend I will talk to him and will ask him to take more pictures, with special attention to the nib imprint, pen cap, clip, bands and barrel.

I think in the pics you can kind of see dry ink around the nib and feed. I don't know how many decades that has been stored. More than 40 years perhaps?

On the other hand, he found it right beside a grey Parker 51 (16k gold filled cap with a blue diamond clip). That one seems fully functional after all these years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The diamond made me think of Conway Stewart, but I don't think they did rounded ends like the one on this mystery 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35347
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30428
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...