Jump to content

Vac Mini Compared To Twsbi Mini (And Others)


SNAK

Recommended Posts

excellent pictures and i can see that you're quite right, our VM nib units do appear to be the same after all. and a lot more similar to the OP's than i originally understood to be the case. it had never occurred to me that the inner nib unit screwed into the sleeve which in turn screwed into the pen body. the OP's picture had me thinking it was constructed differently: i'd imagined that the sleeve on the nib section of the OP's VM was part of the pen body and the nib unit fit through that to screw into the pen body itself, not threads within the sleeve. clearly it's just a matter of the OP having partially disassembled his from the get-go rather than having unscrewed the whole nib assembly and then disassembled that, as you did in your most recent pictures.

 

well, there we go! mystery solved and my mistake all along after all. my apologies for doubting your previous observations.

 

that said i'd still say the recent VM looks a whole lot more like the Diamond Mini in the OP's picture than it does the his VM but it would seem that's more perception than fact.

 

(heads off to correct other posts)

"i spent roughly 20 years writing a journal that extended to some 35 volumes. at the end of it i'd written a bunch of words that ended relationships, filled up my closet, spent a river of ink and afforded me some excellent practice with fountain pens. out of all of that i kept a few pens. i believe the moral of this story is that when you sit down to write it is best to keep an open mind about what you'll take away from it in the end."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Jamerelbe

    9

  • TSherbs

    5

  • 1pen2pen

    5

  • sirgilbert357

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

@1pen2pen, thanks for that - didn't want to come across as pedantic (though really, I am and I need to own it :lol: !) - just wanted to make sure people reading these threads were able to get a clear picture of the product. And I agree with you: the change to the VM's back end (at least on the smoke model) brings it closer in appearance to the Diamond Mini.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Thanks for this review and information. I'm a big fan of TWSBIs, great pens, hold a lot of ink and are inexpensive. The TWSBIs I guess have a reputation for cracking. My Eco after about 8 months of hard daily usage developed a crack near the front of the feed. TWSBI US is great about replacement parts. $4 for shipping and the turn around is very fast. So cracking and damage isn't a problem because I can fix it within a week for the cost of postage.

I found the Mini Vac and the 700 Vac to be a bit fussy to refill, but still worth it. I bought the Eco just to try out the EF nib. It's a piston filler, holds a lot of ink and I don't need to use the special bottle to fill it up. It's a great pen.

One big issue with buying a TWSBI pen is the Goldilocks Dilemma. The Vac 700 is really big (I'm 5'8 178cm? with average guy hands.) the Eco is about the size of the 580. I use both the 700 and the Eco with the cap off. The Eco is slightly smaller than the Vac 700 but a lot lighter. The MiniVac is just fine with the cap posted. I'd buy another Eco or Mini Vac, without hesitation. The heavier Vac700....I might pass on to my 6' son. The 580 I have no experience with. There are Aluminum AL versions of some of the TWSBIs. I would now opt for the AL version, usually an extra $10US, that would eliminate the cracking that happened to the Eco. (A quick fix was nail hardener. It filled and sealed the crack for a few days. The clear Demonstrators are resin, so would plexiglas cement work? Don't know. I think if I was on a trip I would just use clear nail polish every couple of days.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35571
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31307
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Blog Comments

    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • alkman
      There is still chemistry for processing regular chrome (positive) films like Kodak Ektachrome and Fuji Velvia, but Kodachrome was a completely different and multistep beast. 
    • Ceilidh
      Ah, but how to get it processed - that is the question. I believe that the last machine able to run K-14 (Kodachrome processing) ceased to operate some 15 or so years ago. Perhaps the film will be worth something as a curiosity in my estate sale when I die. 😺
    • Mercian
      Take a lot of photos!   If the film has deteriorated or 'gone off' in any way, you can use that as a 'feature' to take 'arty' pictures - whether of landmarks, or people, or whatever.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...