Jump to content

Duofold & Sonnet converters interchangeable?


otherboss

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Thought more experienced heads might be able to help me out. I just bought a Duofold International and it didn't come with a converter. No problem he thinks! I'll just use that extra converter that fits the Sonnet.

 

Well try as I might, the Sonnet converter won't fit the Duofold. Of course I haven't tried the 10 pound mallet yet, but.....

 

Can anyone tell me if there is a reason why the Sonnet Converter won't fit the Duofold, allowing that everything I've heard, says that Parker converters are interchangeable on all modern Parker pens. I've double checked that the Duofold takes the converter from another International and it does.

 

Can the mystery be solved by the great seers of the FPN. That enough sucking up guys?

 

Seriously, thanks for any help you can give me.

Cheers all.

Barry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • otherboss

    3

  • Dutchpen

    2

  • RLTodd

    1

  • richardandtracy

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Not enough information by a long shot.

 

 

In what sense will it not fit?

 

Too long?

 

Won't slide into the section?

 

Absolutely positive it is a Parker converter?

 

Posted snapshot might help greatly.

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Still trying to sort out this convertor problem I'm having.

 

I've measured the 2 convertors I've got and the measurements are indicated on the photo. The only thing I can see is that the Duofold is slightly thicker than the Sonnet and obviously the body section for the ink is also longer.

 

When I put the Sonnet convertor in the Duofold, there is plenty of room between the inside of the Duofold section and the Sonnet convertor, where there is almost none when I put the Duofold convertor in. It is a close fit to the inside diameter. The problem comes when I try to push the Sonnet convertor onto the Duofold post, in the Duofold section. There is a definite apparent difference between the outside diameter of the Duofold post and the inside diamter of the Sonnet convertor, even though they measure the same inside diamter, which is the same as the standard Parker cartidge - 3.3mm.

 

I'm reluctant to force the Sonnet convertor onto the Duofold post and break something.

 

Any ideas, or is there a different convertor for the Duofold International that I don't know about. Everyone just tells me that Parker convertors are Parker convertors and they all should fit in the modern pens. The Duofolds are from the 1990's.

 

I'm crossing fingers here.

post-37626-126624294069.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are you sure the sonnet isn't a fake one, they are often cloned.

 

hold a magnet near the sonnet nib to check if it is magnetic, if it is, then it is fake.

 

original parker converters should be interchangeable.

 

 

Lennard

Nib (re)plating: please visit www.Dutchpen.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe you could post a pic of the sonnet and the duofold. it looks like the sonnet converter is too tight.

Are you sure it is a parker converter?

 

Lennard

Nib (re)plating: please visit www.Dutchpen.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Duofold Centennial c/c looks identical to the convertor on the right. Its overall length is 72mm, with a maximum diameter just under 7mm. The tip OD is 4.6mm. There are 3 equispaced bumps on it that take the diameter to over 7mm, 15mm from the open end.

 

The pen is a Y.III (Q1, 2007 I think).

 

Regards,

 

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

I have had the Sonnet checked by the Parker distib. in Australia and they say it's an original, so I don't think that's a worry. Maybe it is a fake and Parker here missed it. It obviously has Parker written on it, but that would be normal for a fake anyway.

 

Has anyone got a Parker sonnet converter they can compare (measure)to the one in my photo, or to a genuine replacement? If my sonnet CC is out of wack with the genuine article, then I've got a problem.

 

I'll try to make some time to take some extra photos of the sections.

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, here's the low down.

 

The converter on the left is the original style Parker piston converter. I have just plucked a couple of pens from those lying around here, namely a 1987 Duofold and an early Sonnet ('93 ish) and both have this style converter.

 

The converter on the right is the current type of Parker piston converter. It has been slimmed down to fit narrower pens like the Rialto and Vector which were previously only compatible with the slide-action "pump" converter.

 

Both converters should fit both the Duofold (as Richard has confirmed) and the Sonnet. However, I don't have any recent Sonnet models to check this fully.

 

HTH,

 

Martin

The Writing Desk

Fountain Pen Specialists since 2000

Facebook

Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35630
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31529
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...