Jump to content

Organics Studio Foggy Bottom Yellow Sepia


ToasterPastry

Recommended Posts

Organics Studio Foggy Bottom Yellow Sepia

Another ink review

 

I’m a fan of heirloom inks, or craft inks, or whatever you want to call it. Certainly I’ve given it a thought to create a series of my own inks. What would I call them?

 

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn130/ToasterPastryphoto/Organics_studio_sepia_ink_4.jpg

 

There is a certain charm to the craft ink industry. I appreciate a bottle of Noodler’s Dark Matter, not because it’s black, but what its creator was trying to do; that is, replicate an old bottle of ink. Does it exhibit the exact behavior and look of, say, a bottle of Parker Quink Black from 1945? No, but it’s very, very close. That is not to say that I like all Noodler’s inks, as there is a certain hit or miss aspect depending upon which bottle you buy.

 

Similarly there have been a crop of recent ink manufacturers, like Organics Studio, that have been making the rounds at the shows. I’m a sucker for new inks, especially when they include cute cartoon characters and label the bottle with ‘special edition.’

 

Organics Studio is a small start up company based in Maryland created by Tyler Thompson, a biochemistry major at the University of Maryland. After his initial Elements Edition, he has created a line of inks for Pendleton Brown, a Writers’ Series, and a couple of recent sepia inks, the most recent one, the green sepia was introduced this year.

 

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn130/ToasterPastryphoto/Organics_studio_ink_2.jpg

 

This yellow sepia, or as would call it, sepia, was first introduced at the Washington DC Pen Show last year. The first 100 bottles of this ink were labeled as a limited edition 1 through 100, and probably came in glass bottles. The recent bottle I purchased was a plastic 55 ml bottle (1.8 ounces) with an ink-jet printed label. I purchased this ink through Anderson Pens, whom I must say, provided very expedient surface. The price was $14, which appears to be the going rate for this bottle.

 

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn130/ToasterPastryphoto/OrganicsStudio_Sepia_1.jpg

 

 

What I love about this ink.

 

I really loved the performance and behavior of this ink. I loaded it in an old Parker 45, and it worked very well with just about any paper that I encountered. It does not bleed or feather terribly. It’s dry-time is reasonable. I should note that it’s not waterproof. Some people are obsessed with this trait, but I’m pretty ambivalent. Most of my documents are eventually scanned anyway.

 

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn130/ToasterPastryphoto/Organics_Studio_sepia_3.jpg

The waterproof test. The ink that I used to label these lines was Pelikan 4001 Blue-Black.

 

What I hate about this ink.

 

I just paid $14, not including shipping, for a tiny plastic bottle of ink (less than 2 ounces). The label is very much homemade, on an ink-jet printer no less. For a few bucks more I can get a gorgeous glass bottle that I can put on the shelf and show-off, even if I don’t like the ink. For less money, I can get more ink, still in a basic glass bottle. You think this doesn’t matter, but it does. Let’s talk about the color. Brown is brown. There is light brown and dark brown and really dark brown, but it’s still brown. You can call it sepia or sienna or caramel or whatever, but it’s still brown. Some shades look great for inks, some shades work well for walls. Organics Studio makes a Boron Brown which is darker brown, and probably better for writing. In terms of color, I prefer this sepia over the Diamine Sepia, which I have since used for mixing. Organics Studio Foggy Bottom Yellow Sepia is essentially a light brown that shades yellow. On chromatography I see a hint of blue, mostly yellow with some red. It works for pens that pour out a lot of ink: it clearly looks brown, not black. But in the fine-point Parker 45, even one with generous flow, it wrote too lightly for my tastes, some papers were worse than others.

 

Conclusion.

 

A very well-behaved fountain pen ink that is a bit light in color for professional use. Unless you’re using a broad-tipped nib that pours out a lot of ink, you’ll have trouble appreciating the shading and vibrancy of the ink. The price-point was the biggest disappointment for me. For less money, and more ink (in a glass bottle), I’d probably stick with a basic brown ink.

 

 

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn130/ToasterPastryphoto/pop.jpg

 

Follow me on Twitter!

Read my silly blog!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ToasterPastry

    2

  • amberleadavis

    1

  • requiescat

    1

  • visvamitra

    1

Nice review, thanks! I wonder how this is to sketch with--I'd find it a bit pale for writing, as you point out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Very nice. Thank you.

Fountain pens are my preferred COLOR DELIVERY SYSTEM (in part because crayons melt in Las Vegas).

Create a Ghostly Avatar and I'll send you a letter. Check out some Ink comparisons: The Great PPS Comparison 

Don't know where to start?  Look at the Inky Topics O'day.  Then, see inks sorted by color: Blue Purple Brown Red Green Dark Green Orange Black Pinks Yellows Blue-Blacks Grey/Gray UVInks Turquoise/Teal MURKY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I like the color but this ink has awful properties - it caused nib creep in all the pens that I had filled with it. Quite good pens. I would say it's worst OS ink I've tried when it comes to its behaviour and lack of good manners ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35346
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30417
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...