Jump to content

Sheaffer's Skrip Chemopure


jamesem

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I have a question about a bottle of Sheaffer's Skrip Chemopure ink I bought over the weekend.

 

I have never heard of this ink nor can I find any information on the internet, or at least the searches I have tried. It is the larger 4oz. bottle and is still full of the blue-black ink in the original box. The box is in good condition except the glue on the seams has come undone so the seams are falling apart. If anything, it is a cool bottle and box, bigger than the normal skrip bottles I see in the antique stores. I already have four of those and use the ink from one of them...smile.

 

What I want to know is if this ink would be safe to use in my vintage or newer pens. I will try it on my dip pens so in case the ink is bad, I don't mess up my fountain pens. But aside from that, was this ink ever as popular as the regular Skrip ink? Was it a safe ink when it was new?

 

Thank you and have a great day!

 

James E. Merrit

Thank you and have a great day!!!

 

James E.Merritt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • wimg

    2

  • Roger W.

    1

  • jamesem

    1

  • bvanlent

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi James,

 

Although I have a few of the 2 oz. and very tiny dip pen bottles of Old Skrip, I haven't heard of this particular ink before, so thank you for sharing! That's a great find!

 

Regarding use of it in a pen: if there is no stuff floating in the ink, blobs or molds or something, it should be safe to use in a pen. I would put a little in a small jar or vial, cover it with some filter paper, and let it stand for a few days, to really make sure it hasn't got anything funny growing in it :D, and next first try it out in a cheaper pen. All of this to be on the cautious side of better safe than sorry :D.

If all of this works out, after having had it in a cheaper pen for a few weeks, without any problems, I would then try it out in another pen, and just use it, provided of course I did like the colour.

 

HTH, warm regards, Wim

the Mad Dutchman
laugh a little, love a little, live a lot; laugh a lot, love a lot, live forever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wim;

 

I had answered this on Zoss but, since you are interested as well, I'll answer it here. Chem-o-pure is 1939 scrip. I'm not sure there is any difference in the formulation as scrip never would mold or have sediment - I think it was just salesmanship. Anyway, unless it has an obvious problem, it is scrip, it is as safe now as in 1939. I only use vintage scrip, most of it is over 50 years old.

 

Roger W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Roger!

 

I just never could get used to the Zoss format, so I unlisted, a long time ago. So, thank you for making the effort to explain things here, too! It is very much appreciated.

 

Warm regards, Wim

the Mad Dutchman
laugh a little, love a little, live a lot; laugh a lot, love a lot, live forever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 18 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35328
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30393
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...