Jump to content

Waterman squeeze converter


InkyProf

Recommended Posts

Can the sac in a 1980s French-made Waterman squeeze converter (original to a Man 100) be replaced? If so, any tips on disassembly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • InkyProf

    3

  • USG

    2

  • thx1138

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

On 3/11/2026 at 5:09 AM, InkyProf said:

Can the sac in a 1980s French-made Waterman squeeze converter (original to a Man 100) be replaced? If so, any tips on disassembly?

 

This style converter?

This is from one of my old CF Waterman pens.

20260319_214727.thumb.jpg.c24f05ce711e3b6fb2e1db90ed141cfe.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, thx1138 said:

This style converter?

 

Thanks for replying. The metal body looks like what I have, yes; but mine has (or: had; see below) a tapered rubber plug at the mouth that allows it to fit into Waterman pens that are supposed to take "standard" (post-C/F) Waterman converters, like the Man 100. I can't tell if yours is like that or not because of the shadow at the open end. I don't have a C/F pen to which to compare anything, but I thought C/F carts and converters were straight cylinders at the mouth, not tapered. I am very likely misremembering, though.

 

In any case, I tried to remove that rubber plug, and I did, but I think I almost certainly damaged it in doing so, because now I'm left with a plug that seats very shallowly in the mouth of the housing, a small cylindrical metal sleeve that appears to have been used to compress the mouth of the sac against the inside wall of the housing (?), the housing, and the pressure bar. I see nothing to which a new sac could be attached (and no indication of how the old one WAS attached) leading me to think that I tore something essential in disassembly, which I regret all the more if what I had was in fact a C/F converter!

 

All I can think to do is to try to use the business end of an empty Waterman cartridge (not a C/F, in my case) to replace the plug, and shellac a sac to that, but that would depend on the cartridge fitting snugly into the housing. I don't want to risk a situation in which, when I try to remove the converter from the pen, the housing comes out and the plug stays behind and has to be tweezed or otherwise coaxed out of the section.

 

But if I'm missing something, I'm all ears. And I'd love to know the procedure I should have followed, in the unlikely event that I ever get to do this again.

 

Back story, if you're interested: all of this arose because the pen I'm trying to use, a first year Man 100 with the plastic rather than the brass section threads, is supposed to work with standard modern Waterman converters, as my Man 100 Opera does. (The squeeze converter I have came with the first-year Man 100, and fit it snugly, but was obviously unusuable, as the sac was visibly dry and cracked.) I bought a NOS Waterman converter with a ridged (or possibly finely threaded) metal band near the mouth, which was advertised as working with all modern Waterman pens, but it didn't work with either of these Man 100s, so I returned it. I now have a different NOS Waterman converter with a smooth metal band near the mouth, which works great in the Opera but is just a little too loose for comfort in this pen: functional, but feels like it could fall out if knocked or shaken. Assuming I've now lost any chance of repairing the old squeeze converter, I'll try one of the current-production ones without the metal band, or I'll just refill cartridges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahoy Inkus

 

This sounds familiar.  I had 2, only found one.  Came with my Patricians.  Now I'm not sure what pen it's from.

 

Is this it?

 

large.IMG_5748900.jpg.c9ee3b1a0a10df20b51cd8e24d9d3aa1.jpg

 

large.IMG_5747900.jpg.cd0a88843da2f01bd32881ae2d969ed6.jpg

 

LINK <-- my Ink and Paper tests

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, USG said:

Ahoy Inkus

 

This sounds familiar.  I had 2, only found one.  Came with my Patricians.  Now I'm not sure what pen it's from.

 

Is this it?

 

large.IMG_5748900.jpg.c9ee3b1a0a10df20b51cd8e24d9d3aa1.jpg

 

large.IMG_5747900.jpg.cd0a88843da2f01bd32881ae2d969ed6.jpg

 

 

Yep, that looks like it. I'm in the library so don't have it here; mine might be longer? But it might not. And the plug is exactly like yours. (So a Patrician would make sense: same era as the Man 100s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, InkyProf said:

 

Yep, that looks like it. I'm in the library so don't have it here; mine might be longer? But it might not. And the plug is exactly like yours. (So a Patrician would make sense: same era as the Man 100s).

PM sent

 

LINK <-- my Ink and Paper tests

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35597
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31468
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...