Jump to content

American-made Waterman's 42 1/2V, but with a French-made overlay


Roger Zhao

Recommended Posts

I've always loved these window diamond pattern safety pens, but I only ever owned a gold-plated Uniqlo before. Receiving a solid gold Waterman's, the leading brand of safety pens, was a delightful surprise.

 

The previous owner was Spanish, and he didn't seem to know it was a solid gold overlay, nor did he understand the meaning of the markings and inscriptions, so I bought it at a lovely price,LOL. There was a network problem during payment, and the seller couldn't print an invoice; I almost had to arrange a face-to-face transaction in Madrid.

 

Anyway, the Eagle Hallmark on the pen and the logo of JIF Group, Waterman's French distributor, on the back of the nib indicate that this pen was originally sold in France, then traveled over a century to Madrid, and finally crossed halfway around the world to Shanghai.

 

Waterman's naming convention in the 1920s was quite simple. This is a 4-finger safety pen; 2 fingers use a #2 nib; 1/2 and V represent the fine and short versions (Vest pocket) respectively.

 

Like most Waterman's safety pens, its ripple sleeve is made in the USA. However, unlike the non-overlay version, it lacks the Waterman's globe logo and patent number on the side, suggesting it was a special edition made specifically for later overlay. The 18K gold overlay is made in France. Like other gold items made in France, it is covered with stamps and hallmarks to prove its purity. The nib is manufactured in Waterman's New York factory, then exported to France for assembly.

 

I've been selling pens in Europe for over a year now, and many of the pens I've sold, including some from my own collection, come from other people's relics. Many pens were extremely valuable in their time, and have been preserved remarkably well for decades or even centuries. Yet, after their owners passed away, they lost the care and understanding of their owners, and were subsequently sold off cheaply by their descendants. It is truly a pity and a lamentable situation.

 

 

Roger,

Written in the late autumn/early winter of 2025 at Dormitory Building No. 8, Youyuan Campus, Tongji University

20251116_184136.thumb.jpg.32dc42c94a0c93b4eb496cb15d4029ec.jpg20251116_184258.thumb.jpg.0e466627e106db2c95cfe8bb2c0e974f.jpg20251116_184335.thumb.jpg.a920ec04f3320a946d7a06de43897398.jpg20251118_005225.thumb.jpg.dc0758bce378aaf0df30021dae0c3789.jpg20251118_005350.thumb.jpg.02a8c3418f7d0c062033e54db1cb362a.jpg20251118_005425.thumb.jpg.a31f97282f4619c075b6413326e25310.jpg20251118_171225.thumb.jpg.c5dce4b938cccfa825912ec7318f3b38.jpg20250603_191814.thumb.jpg.31877df49661f1e2aad38132549b8e67.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Glenn-SC

    1

  • GlenV

    1

  • Roger Zhao

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I thought that a 42-1/2 Waterman would have been a Safety (4*) pen with a No. 2 nib (*2) nib that is thin (1/2) and short (V).  
 

I would have had to tell the Seller that the overlay was solid gold and set a price on that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35357
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30456
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • asota
      ...random aside - I still have some 30 rolls of unused, long-expired Kodachrome 64 film (35mm). They have been frozen since 2009. No idea why I have held on to them for this long, but I guess I'm hoping for a miracle. I too have never developed colour film but I still d&p my B&W to this day. As a passion, of course.  
    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...