Jump to content

Is this a Waterman?


wmc

Recommended Posts

This pen/pencil set was inherited with several hundred pens from my father. I would like to identify it. The pen and pencil are marked "STERLING." The top of the pen is marked 452 over 1/2 V. The nib is marked Waterman 2. The case is leather and marked with an embossed cartouche that may be just a decoration. 

I would like to make the pen functional (the pencil works). Is the section glued in? A day of soaking in water hasn't loosened it and I'm leery about using a tool.

I am also curious about these cased pen sets (I also have a Carter's set). How were they used? They seem inconvenient.

BillCaseCartouche.thumb.jpg.76240c7b090561eb02c618a1e6c777e9.jpgWatermanCased.thumb.jpg.54b582d07f808da86ae0f09472b3827d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • pen lady

    1

  • shalitha33

    1

  • wmc

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

A Waterman for sure! Usually ring-tops are considered to be ladies pens (though not always) and it's interesting that the case you have is quite masculine looking.  It you are not used to servicing 100 year old pens, please proceed with great caution. This black material in your set is hard black rubber and it can be fragile and doesn't like being soaked in water!!!! The section will be friction-fit and unless the previous person working on it played a really dirty trick, it shouldn't be glued in.  You will need heat (a hairdryer works at a pinch) and section pliers of some kind and a ton of patience.  Do some research before you do anything more please.  BTW does the lead in the pencil go out and in? Early Waterman pencils were ''expel'' only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35360
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30458
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • asota
      ...random aside - I still have some 30 rolls of unused, long-expired Kodachrome 64 film (35mm). They have been frozen since 2009. No idea why I have held on to them for this long, but I guess I'm hoping for a miracle. I too have never developed colour film but I still d&p my B&W to this day. As a passion, of course.  
    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...