Jump to content

Cambridge college-ruled stiff-backed writing pads are no more


ek-hornbeck

Recommended Posts

I've been using Mead Cambridge stiff-backed, 70-page, college-ruled writing pads for about thirty years. (They're SKU 59872.) They're great. They nailed the small details. The heavy top cover is scored at two places to make it wrap easily around to the back of the pad when one is using it. The pages are pre-punched for a three-hole binder. The college ruling is just right for me. The 20lb paper is pretty nice -- it's not 24lb Top Docket Diamond 25% cotton almost-stationery, but it's quite good and it's real-deal US 8.5"x11" format, which fits into my American life better than European or Japanese paper. (And it's a heckuva lot cheaper than Docket Diamond pads.) The strong, stiff cardboard back is great and the whole thing travels in my daypack pretty robustly. I've gotten a lot of research done on these pads.

 

So... Mead has discontinued them. I got onto a chat session with a human on Mead's web site, who confirmed: gone.

 

This sucks.

 

EKH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • inkstainedruth

    1

  • dbs

    1

  • ek-hornbeck

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

I know how you feel.  

I'm not sure what I'm going to do for journaling once I'm down to the last A5 600 page Miquelrius soft cover journal because I looked on their website a few years ago and they'd stopped making that size....  And when you're doing "morning pages" and writing 3 pages a day first thing every morning, even THOSE were being gone through at a fair clip (more than 2 full ones per year).

And the first time I got some I ordered a bunch (more than a dozen, as I recall) directly from their US distributor.... :(

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Probably you have never realized that you are already a dinosaur at the year of very few people typing --  and you are still writing, with ink, pen and real paper etc.

 

I can promise you, for the sake of Charles Darwin, you will eventually evolute, in hard way,  to a chicken -- has two wings, has two legs, and of course, can fly like a dinosaur if you are really feel in danger. But, in stead of sitting in a museum, most of time, you will lie on my dishes --- the cost of refusing to evolute with rest of the world.

 

You don't need Mead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30436
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...