Jump to content

Initial Review of Kaco RETRO Fountain Pen


donnweinberg

Recommended Posts

This is my initial review of a relatively recent addition to the Kaco brand of pens -- the Retro, which is offered in several colors with an extra-fine (EF) stainless steel nib that is hooded.  I purchased from a Chinese seller two of the Retro FPs, one in red and the other in turquoise.  Here are photos that I took.  In the photos showing the packaging, I already removed the cartridges and already placed the included converter into the pens:

 

MetroRed-inbox.thumb.jpeg.997ccfd92f55233e22b7d19c4976f8f1.jpeg

 

MetroTurquoise-inbox.thumb.jpeg.2966afdc73ea97f6f7e9a9c53e068438.jpeg

 

MetroRed-capped.thumb.jpeg.6b7dd29335e39e220fa4a756398d5474.jpeg

 

MetroTurquoise-capped.thumb.jpeg.ba6ffe8e60f50b7386d308399562d44f.jpeg

 

MetroRed-3parts.thumb.jpeg.c2ab5cf05497f80c3f245167f836272f.jpeg

 

MetroTurquoise-3parts.thumb.jpeg.e2bb67f7ba55130c49e0d1ef9a6cb57b.jpeg

 

These are light-weight and youthful-looking pens.  Capped and filled with ink, the pen weighs only 17g, the cap of which alone contributing 7g.  The cap easily and securely posts.  The converter fits snugly into the section.  The clip is very firm, but the plastic ball at its end facilitates placing it or removing it from a pocket.  I measured the length of the capped pen at 5.75".  

 

I filled the red version's converter with Robert Oster "Hot Pink" ink, which is more like a red than a pink.  The pen wrote immediately.  The nib is somewhat nail-like -- very stiff -- but it writes relatively smoothly, though noisily.  The EF nib lays down a moderately wet line with what is closer to a fine thickness, and there is no line variation between horizontal and vertical strokes, as the nib is not designed to do that.  

 

An odd, though not bad, feature is seen in the last photo below, a closeup of the red pen where the section meets the barrel.  

 

MetroRed-window.thumb.jpeg.79687c43fc240453f67f7b715c813e4f.jpeg

 

One might think that the transparent area is an ink window.  The only thing one sees, at least when a converter is installed, is the converter's black connector, not the ink level.  I have not tried the pen with a cartridge, so I don't know whether one would be able to see a bit of ink in one.  Perhaps someone else will try that and let us know.

 

A FP connoisseur probably will not be impressed with this pen, but it makes a nice beginner FP, especially for the young, as its looks are youthful, and it is easy to fill and use.  Has anyone else tried this pen?  If so, what are your impressions?

 

Edited by donnweinberg
Corrected my misnaming of the pen as Metro, when it's the Retro. Removed one early sentence that also assumed the "Metro" incorrect name.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • donnweinberg

    2

  • jchch1950

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I paid $12.21 for each one.

Edited by donnweinberg
As I edited the name in the first, main post, I deleted from the second post that I had gotten the name wrong, and just left the price I paid for it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    357.4k
    Total Topics
    4.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    129,849
    Total Members
    18,857
    Most Online
    Bobbybramp
    Newest Member
    Bobbybramp
    Joined
  • Albums



  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35355
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30449
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...