Jump to content

EFNIR: ESS Registrars Ink


LizEF

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Sailor Kenshin said:

'You shouldn't shrug with a sphinx on your shoulder.'  Quote of the day!  👍🏻

:D

 

37 minutes ago, Sailor Kenshin said:

This ink is right up my color ally, but I'm afeared of iron galls.

Everything I've read says there's no need to fear with gold nibs.  And all inks with permanence require extra cleaning...

 

39 minutes ago, Sailor Kenshin said:

Thanks once again for a fascinating review! 

:) You're most welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • LizEF

    22

  • yazeh

    4

  • Nick T

    4

  • A Smug Dill

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Awww. I miss it.

Akkerman's #10 kind of bested ESSRI for me and I gave my 2/3 bottle away (I think).

I love these hard working no nonsense inks. Thanks for reminding me of its charms. 😊

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tas said:

Awww. I miss it.

Akkerman's #10 kind of bested ESSRI for me and I gave my 2/3 bottle away (I think).

I love these hard working no nonsense inks. Thanks for reminding me of its charms. 😊

:)  You're very welcome!  Maybe I'll add Akkerman #10 to my list of inks to sample next year, when I run out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for @LizEF;

at the very end of your review of ESSRI, you have written “AAR: Low” - what do you mean by that?


My apologies if it’s blindingly-obvious, and my thanks to you in advance for the answer.

 

Slàinte,
M.

large.Mercia45x27IMG_2024-09-18-104147.PNG.4f96e7299640f06f63e43a2096e76b6e.PNG  Foul in clear conditions, but handsome in the fog.  spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mercian said:

I have a question for @LizEF;

at the very end of your review of ESSRI, you have written “AAR: Low” - what do you mean by that?


My apologies if it’s blindingly-obvious, and my thanks to you in advance for the answer.

 

Slàinte,
M.

:D  Only obvious if you've seen previous reviews where I spell it out: "Aircraft Attraction Rating" (sometimes "Automobile Attraction Rating" and other times I've used "Helicopter...", "Moving Vehicle...", or "Vehicular..." - or something like that).  I added it as a way to humorize my frustration over being interrupted by helicopters, light aircraft, every one of my neighbors leaving the subdivision at the same time, etc.  It's a reflection of how many times I had to pause during the video and wait for the noise to drop.  Once the video is sped up, it's hard to notice these, though you might notice the sudden disappearance of a background noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, yes - I remember watching earlier reviews in which National Guard helicopters were ‘buzzing’ your house (perhaps to get a closer look at the ink?). In the video, they sounded like buzz-saws.

 

Thanks 🙂

large.Mercia45x27IMG_2024-09-18-104147.PNG.4f96e7299640f06f63e43a2096e76b6e.PNG  Foul in clear conditions, but handsome in the fog.  spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mercian said:

... (perhaps to get a closer look at the ink?)...

:lol: We have infrared goggles, night vision goggles, and now see-ink-through-the-roof goggles.  Let's hope they never invent ink-seeking missiles! :yikes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LizEF said:

Let's hope they never invent ink-seeking missiles! :yikes:

 

Slingshot one of the 72 ink samples at the aircraft encroaching your airspace, i.e. directly above your property and within slingshot distance?

 

Maybe just the remainder of the ESSRI. (Acid attack!)

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, A Smug Dill said:

Slingshot one of the 72 ink samples at the aircraft encroaching your airspace, i.e. directly above your property and within slingshot distance?

 

Maybe just the remainder of the ESSRI. (Acid attack!)

:lticaptd: I suspect that's a federal crime - or would be if my slingshot could go that far and I could aim accurately.

 

"But, your honor, I looked through the statutes, and nowhere did it say it was a crime to splatter fountain pen ink on Army helicopters..."  😇

 

(Now I'm envisioning a stick woman...  And now - moments later - I'm envisioning a new video game... :D )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LizEF said:

"But, your honor, I looked through the statutes, and nowhere did it say it was a crime to splatter fountain pen ink on Army helicopters..."  😇

 

I was actually alluding to how to divert ink-seeking missiles.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, A Smug Dill said:

I was actually referring to how to divert ink-seeking missiles.

Oh, even better!  We need a video game programmer now! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LizEF said:

"But, your honor, I looked through the statutes, and nowhere did it say it was a crime to splatter fountain pen ink on Army helicopters..."


As your Attorney*, I advise you to not try to twang ESSRI at military helicopters!

 

Whilst there may not be any statute that proscribes any attempt to ink any inbound Army/NG Iroquois (UH-1), I’m fairly sure that aiming ESSRI at them would, in light of its acidity, not only be prosecutable as being tantamount to attempted assault with chemical weapons, but as such it might even be viewed by the local NG commander as constituting justification to send out a ‘gunship’ helicopter to launch a retaliatory strike against you.


Those tend to carry ‘Hellfire’ missiles - if the NG decides to hit your house with one of those buggers, the only way to show that you were ever even there might be to look for scattered bits of BSB-stained debris!

 

* Caveat lectrix: I am not an Attorney, and nor do I even play one on television.

large.Mercia45x27IMG_2024-09-18-104147.PNG.4f96e7299640f06f63e43a2096e76b6e.PNG  Foul in clear conditions, but handsome in the fog.  spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Mercian said:

As your Attorney*, I advise you to not try to twang ESSRI at military helicopters!

 

Whilst there may not be any statute that proscribes any attempt to ink any inbound Army/NG Iroquois (UH-1), I’m fairly sure that aiming ESSRI at them would, in light of its acidity, not only be prosecutable as being tantamount to attempted assault with chemical weapons, but as such it might even be viewed by the local NG commander as constituting justification to send out a ‘gunship’ helicopter to launch a retaliatory strike against you.


Those tend to carry ‘Hellfire’ missiles - if the NG decides to hit your house with one of those buggers, the only way to show that you were ever even there might be to look for scattered bits of BSB-stained debris!

 

* Caveat lectrix: I am not an Attorney, and nor do I even play one on television.

:lticaptd:  Thank you for your wise counsel.  I shall use my ink-launcher only to launch decoys for the ink-seeking missiles, so they explode away from my house.  And just in case they fail, I'll order one each of the Baystate colors, and maybe some Kung Te-Cheng, to strategically position in different parts of the house - for help analyzing the blast pattern...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Here's the line width measurement. The line is one of those used for dry time.  Magnification is 100x.  The grid is 100x100µm.  The scale is 330µm, with eleven divisions of 30µm each.  The line width for this ink is roughly 300µm.

 

large.ESSRegistrarsInkLW.jpg.19087527c4846041279e8dcc2d3c417e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

@LizEF sorry to disturb (abashed) but do you know where I can buy a new bottle of ESSR? The website says they don’t ship internationally anymore and I’m getting low. Thanks!!

Cheers - Nicholas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Nick T said:

@LizEF sorry to disturb (abashed) but do you know where I can buy a new bottle of ESSR? The website says they don’t ship internationally anymore and I’m getting low. Thanks!!

Sorry, I have no idea.  I had assumed it was only available from them and I can't find any other source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had thought the same thing.  

And if they aren't shipping internationally from the UK?  I wouldn't even know where to begin to get a bottle, unless being able to find some person in the UK to buy it and ship it to the US -- or being able to to travel to the UK and buy it directly.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35328
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30393
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...