Jump to content

22, The Eyedropper Era


rhr

Recommended Posts

Well, it's time once again. If no one has any complaints, I will resume my series of favorite pen patents, the second series, which really should have been the first. The first series should have been the second, and the second first, because these favorites are taken from the first US patents, the ones from the early period.

 

 

The Eyedropper Era.

 

Someone used the term "the eyedropper era" awhile back, and it got me thinking. What exactly constitutes the eyedropper pen era? And more to the point, when exactly did the eyedropper pen era start? In order to have an eyedropper era, you must first have an eyedropper. And not all pens capable of being filled with an eyedropper fall within this eyedropper era. For instance, all the Bion-type pens going back to 1650-1700 could now be filled with an eyedropper, but at the time they were made, they were filled either by pouring the ink in, or with glass tube pipettes.

 

What's needed for the eyedropper era to begin is, first of all, the invention of soft, pliable rubber, and then, secondly, the invention of squeeze-bulb technology. The former didn't come along until Nathaniel Hayward's 1839 US patent for soft rubber, assigned to Charles Goodyear, and Goodyear's own improved 1844 US patent for soft rubber, and Thomas Hancock's 1844 patent for the same in the UK. But that's not the beginning of the eyedropper pen era, yet. You still need the later squeeze-bulb technologies to be discovered and perfected and popularized before that potential is recognized and utilized and adapted for medicine droppers and eyedroppers.

 

According to Mike Woshner's book, India-Rubber And Gutta-Percha In The Civil War Era, the first squeeze-bulbs didn't make their appearances until the late 1840s and early-to-mid 1850s. They were used for such purposes as artificial nipples, breast pumps, saliva pumps, various dental and medical pumps and syringes, enema pumps and syringes, and air pumps. There is even an 1856 pneumatic fountain inkwell with a squeeze-bulb, patent no. 14,451.

 

In spite of all this, I couldn't find a patent for an eyedropper itself, but perhaps it was already common knowledge by the time the first eyedropper patents were applied for, and it was considered prior art, and unpatentable. Maybe it's just a matter of finding the right title, or name, or search term. So the eyedropper probably dates to some time in the late 1840s to mid 1850s. In any case, the first "medicine-dropper" patent that I could find wasn't until 1868, patent no. 79,487, and that one doesn't fit into the Civil War era, so it isn't even included in the Woshner book. But it would make a great traveling inkwell.

 

Even so, most of the pens of the period were still said to be filled "by pouring the ink in", 6,672, and 16,299, and 123,263, rather than being filled with an eyedropper. Has anyone else been able to find an earlier patent for an eyedropper, or medicine dropper?

 

Also see patent no. 296,963 for a pen that incorporates an eyedropper bulb into the pen, and patent no. 542,450 with one of the first patent illustrations of an eyedropper being used to fill a pen.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    2

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks to Olle Hjort at Lion & Pen for posting this patent over there, patent no. 5,789.

 

He's right. Fig. 9 in the illustration is probably the earliest representation of an eyedropper for a fountain pen. But the pen is a dual filler. It has a rubber sac and may also be filled as a finger-press filler.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35579
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31343
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Blog Comments

    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • alkman
      There is still chemistry for processing regular chrome (positive) films like Kodak Ektachrome and Fuji Velvia, but Kodachrome was a completely different and multistep beast. 
    • Ceilidh
      Ah, but how to get it processed - that is the question. I believe that the last machine able to run K-14 (Kodachrome processing) ceased to operate some 15 or so years ago. Perhaps the film will be worth something as a curiosity in my estate sale when I die. 😺
    • Mercian
      Take a lot of photos!   If the film has deteriorated or 'gone off' in any way, you can use that as a 'feature' to take 'arty' pictures - whether of landmarks, or people, or whatever.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...