Jump to content

Pilot Con-70 Is Driving Me Nuts


prodo123

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • awa54

    3

  • A Smug Dill

    2

  • minddance

    2

  • XYZZY

    2

As far as getting both converters and feed systems clinically clean goes, there are non-invasive ways to accomplish these ends:

 

For the CON 70 in specific, (as previously mentioned) using a 10cc (or larger) syringe with a blunt needle that's slightly larger gauge than the center breather tube allows you to force water through the breather and into the top chamber that's under the filler button (accomplished by carefully placing the needle over the breather tube opening and pushing clean water through). This process will remove all traces of ink from the converter after just a few cycles. If it doesn't, add a little ammonia or pen cleaner to the first few flush cycles, then finish with plain water.

 

Near perfect nib and feed hygiene can be had with a combination of ultrasonic cleaning (for dried ink, high dye content ink, or pigment based inks) and pulling warm water through the system with a syringe and dummy cartridge. Between these two techniques, you can remove all traces of previous inks from any pen when done thoroughly. If warm water alone isn't sufficient, adding some ammonia or pen cleaning solution will improve results significantly.

 

This assumes that we're dealing with *fountain pen* inks and that any dried ink has been in the system for less than a decade, long dried carbon inks or any drawing inks will probably require disassembly to remove completely ...or may not be removable at all.

It also assumes that the pen in question is a cartridge filling design, which allows access to the supply end of the feed without dismounting a fixed filler system. For pens like that, I suggest following Ron's suggestion of letting "clean enough for a similar color" be your standard ...it's much easier to attain and once accepted will allow you to sleep better :)

 

 

The CON 70 is my favorite Pilot converter and as some have stated here, I believe it to be the best of any makers' offerings in terms of both capacity and ease of getting a complete fill. The only real drawback is that it only fits Pilot pens and a very limited number of models at that.

 

 

David-

 

So many restoration projects...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2018 at 4:31 AM, Ardakilic said:

I never heard good feedback about con-70. I currently syringe fill the cartridges and so far I'm happy with the outcome.

 

Or syringe-fill the CON-70 for more ink capacity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday I uncapped a metal Pilot Falcon SEF to find the cap was full of ink and it's con-70 empty. The pen had been unused for a couple of months, but stored horizontal in it's felt-lined slot in a pen drawer.

 

This my third con-70 with issues. Another flowed too well (with Pilot ink) making a SF nib look like a B. The other one gets more bubbles than ink no matter how slow I press the button or how deep into the ink.

 

Have had enough! With opaque Pilots I can just use cartridges or a con-40, but the clear or translucent pens  either of those options will look pathetic.

Will work for pens... :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AmandaW said:

With opaque Pilots I can just use cartridges or a con-40, but the clear or translucent pens  either of those options will look pathetic.

 

Well, the CON-40 is with what Pilot chooses to pair Prera Iro-ai (the ones with clear bodies) to show off the colour of ink; and, to be fair, the CON-40 is less opaque than any of CON-70, CON-50, CON-20, and CON-B converters.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually CON 70s fill best with a brisk press (or three), since the floating plug needs to be seated/sealed in the mouth of the converter to allow the quasi-aerometric tube to expel air from the top of the ink chamber.

The bubbles might be from an air leak somewhere in the cartridge interface or the pens section, or it could be that the rubber plug has somehow gotten pushed up too far on the floating aero-ish tube (but of course it could just be a bum converter).

 

As far as syringe filling, I'd guess that you gain 0.1-0.2cc of extra ink compared to a complete fill using the button and a bottle that allows the pen to have its section immersed in ink, but it's certainly a valid method for getting a better fill with half empty bottles!

David-

 

So many restoration projects...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35608
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31488
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...