Jump to content

Help Identifying An Early Waterman


flows69

Recommended Posts

Good evening from France,

I just received this pen which was included in a lot of pen I bought online. It says Pat'd May 24 1898 on the cap and the Waterman #2 nib seems to have some reasonable flex. Any one able to help me identify the model?

 

When it comes to vintage pens I am mostly focused on Mabie Todds and am rather out of my depth here ;-)

 

Have a very good day guys,

 

 

post-138926-0-08070900-1528841307_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-95860800-1528841311_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-21226800-1528841322_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-23740900-1528841327_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-01698000-1528841335_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-62416900-1528841341_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-20423600-1528841346_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-99514100-1528841349_thumb.jpg

post-138926-0-28322400-1528841354_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tom Heath

    1

  • Left FPN

    1

  • IlyaKovic

    1

  • flows69

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Waterman used 4 digits (XXXX) for their pen designations. Yours is a XX12. The first two digits indicate any kind of metal overlay work (e.g. 0512 would have a gold-filled overlay, 512 would be solid gold overlay). The third digit is the model. A 1X is an eyedropper. Eyedroppers were early models, and there was some lag in the designation when Waterman switched to lever fillers, so some leverfillers are also #1s. Eventually that was changed to XX5X. The last digit is the nib size. In your case #2. There may be some different designation because of the gold plated bands, I'm not sure how they designated early eyedropper trims. Other markings could include a "1/2," meaning the pen is thinner than usual, or a "v," meaning the pen is shorter than usual (for vest pocket).

 

Check the butt of the pen. There should be stamping indicating the model number. It may be highly worn though.

 

I used "X" as a placeholder to show how the numbering system worked, that's just to explain it. There was actually a later pen called a "52X" that was a model 50 with a #2 nib but with a larger than normal body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's one thing I know...it's a lovely pen.

 

My 1914 cataloge has this pen listed as a #12 to #16 Cone Cap.

 

post-42786-0-78338700-1528875531_thumb.jpg

 

post-42786-0-42772600-1528875539_thumb.jpg

 

post-42786-0-20862500-1528875548_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now







×
×
  • Create New...