Jump to content

What Pens Would You Find A Wahl 4 In?


John54green

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Wahlnut

    3

  • Roger W.

    2

  • John54green

    2

  • teej47

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

#4 size nibs were the "norm" as they were used in all the standard sized pens from 1918 through at least the Skyline era (1947ish) What else besides #4 is on the nib? If it says TEMPOINT it is pre-1921, If it says WAHL it could be from a few different periods when the WAHL name was used intermittently, however the most of those nibs would have been from 1921 to about 1923. If it says WAHL PEN then it was from 1923 to 1927 with some spill over to about 1929. If ir says EVERSHARP it was from after 1929. And Gold Seal...you get the idea. There were many models made during each of these periods, but knowing the word(s) on the #4 nib will help narrow down what the pen candidates to take it might be.

 

Syd

Syd "the Wahlnut" Saperstein

Pensbury Manor

Vintage Wahl Eversharp Writing Instruments

Pensbury Manor

 

The WAHL-EVERSHARP Company

www.wahleversharp.com

New WAHL-EVERSHARP fountain and Roller-Ball pens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#4 size nibs were the "norm" as they were used in all the standard sized pens from 1918 through at least the Skyline era (1947ish) What else besides #4 is on the nib? If it says TEMPOINT it is pre-1921, If it says WAHL it could be from a few different periods when the WAHL name was used intermittently, however the most of those nibs would have been from 1921 to about 1923. If it says WAHL PEN then it was from 1923 to 1927 with some spill over to about 1929. If ir says EVERSHARP it was from after 1929. And Gold Seal...you get the idea. There were many models made during each of these periods, but knowing the word(s) on the #4 nib will help narrow down what the pen candidates to take it might be.

 

Syd

 

Syd;

 

I don't follow "norm" as it seems to me the #2 would be far more common. I would think of a 4 as a larger pen (maybe not so much to us today but, by 1920's standards).

 

Roger W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#4 size nibs were the "norm" as they were used in all the standard sized pens from 1918 through at least the Skyline era (1947ish) What else besides #4 is on the nib? If it says TEMPOINT it is pre-1921, If it says WAHL it could be from a few different periods when the WAHL name was used intermittently, however the most of those nibs would have been from 1921 to about 1923. If it says WAHL PEN then it was from 1923 to 1927 with some spill over to about 1929. If ir says EVERSHARP it was from after 1929. And Gold Seal...you get the idea. There were many models made during each of these periods, but knowing the word(s) on the #4 nib will help narrow down what the pen candidates to take it might be.

 

Syd

 

Syd;

 

I don't follow "norm" as it seems to me the #2 would be far more common. I would think of a 4 as a larger pen (maybe not so much to us today but, by 1920's standards).

 

Roger W.

 

Not wanting to chase a red herring here, but your point is well taken, and I really did not think of "norm" as measured back in the day when the vintage pens were made, but "norm" in what I see in pens that have survived. There are surely a large number of #2 that have survived, but it seems to me that what we see today on eBay or on other pens for sale pages, the #4's seem to me to outnumber the #2's. . But I believe there were more #2's sold than #4's (maybe?) Getting back to the question raised by the originator of this thread, there are a lot of #4 candidates for his loose nib to go into.

 

Cheers

Syd

Edited by Wahlnut

Syd "the Wahlnut" Saperstein

Pensbury Manor

Vintage Wahl Eversharp Writing Instruments

Pensbury Manor

 

The WAHL-EVERSHARP Company

www.wahleversharp.com

New WAHL-EVERSHARP fountain and Roller-Ball pens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#4 size nibs were the "norm" as they were used in all the standard sized pens from 1918 through at least the Skyline era (1947ish) What else besides #4 is on the nib? If it says TEMPOINT it is pre-1921, If it says WAHL it could be from a few different periods when the WAHL name was used intermittently, however the most of those nibs would have been from 1921 to about 1923. If it says WAHL PEN then it was from 1923 to 1927 with some spill over to about 1929. If ir says EVERSHARP it was from after 1929. And Gold Seal...you get the idea. There were many models made during each of these periods, but knowing the word(s) on the #4 nib will help narrow down what the pen candidates to take it might be.

 

Syd

 

Syd;

 

I don't follow "norm" as it seems to me the #2 would be far more common. I would think of a 4 as a larger pen (maybe not so much to us today but, by 1920's standards).

 

Roger W.

 

Not wanting to chase a red herring here, but your point is well taken, and I really did not think of "norm" as measured back in the day when the vintage pens were made, but "norm" in what I see in pens that have survived. There are surely a large number of #2 that have survived, but it seems to me that what we see today on eBay or on other pens for sale pages, the #4's seem to me to outnumber the #2's. . But I believe there were more #2's sold than #4's (maybe?) Getting back to the question raised by the originator of this thread, there are a lot of #4 candidates for his loose nib to go into.

 

Cheers

Syd

 

Syd;

 

Agreed it is not what the poster was looking for but, it is an interesting topic. Most collectors have blinders on that lead to them only seeing the large pens because that is what collectors usually go after. Part of that is that we seem to like big and these are the rarer fish. My attack on a company is everything and I've noticed that guys know a lot about the big pens but the little ones go unnoticed. I think it is interesting to note that the #2 sized pen as determined in the 10's is what we generally accepted as the standard size pen. This standard was not static as the late 20's see an explosion in a much larger pen. Wahl was gone by the 1980's but, Sheaffer's Targa is almost identical to a #2 of the 10's! Taking this back to Wahls the Console for instance is almost always found in the 2 size. I would hold that if one bought everything they saw on EBay (as it has no show bias towards the large pens) you end up with more 2's than anything else. Rarely do we have anything like this but if we apply this to an earlier pen we do have this data. Of the 151 pens in the Boston database we have 103 2's or 68.2%. I would further speculate that the larger pens probably had a higher survivability rate but, as they cost more new, clearly a vaster number of 2's were sold as they still outnumber the large pens. I'll have to lean on Sheaffer here that there are in the late 20's more 3's than 5's and still fewer 7's (3-25's, 5-30's and 7-30's) though the 8 Lifetimes are very well represented. The 3-25 was a general replacement of the 22 Student Special or a #2 pen. Though I have less experience with Wahl my Tempoints are in greater numbers 2's.

 

Just an observation - I don't think 4's were the "norm" with 2's and even 3's being encountered more often.

 

Roger W.

Edited by Roger W.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

#4 size nibs were the "norm" as they were used in all the standard sized pens from 1918 through at least the Skyline era (1947ish) What else besides #4 is on the nib? If it says TEMPOINT it is pre-1921, If it says WAHL it could be from a few different periods when the WAHL name was used intermittently, however the most of those nibs would have been from 1921 to about 1923. If it says WAHL PEN then it was from 1923 to 1927 with some spill over to about 1929. If ir says EVERSHARP it was from after 1929. And Gold Seal...you get the idea. There were many models made during each of these periods, but knowing the word(s) on the #4 nib will help narrow down what the pen candidates to take it might be.

 

Syd

 

Syd;

 

I don't follow "norm" as it seems to me the #2 would be far more common. I would think of a 4 as a larger pen (maybe not so much to us today but, by 1920's standards).

 

Roger W.

 

 

Not wanting to chase a red herring here, but your point is well taken, and I really did not think of "norm" as measured back in the day when the vintage pens were made, but "norm" in what I see in pens that have survived. There are surely a large number of #2 that have survived, but it seems to me that what we see today on eBay or on other pens for sale pages, the #4's seem to me to outnumber the #2's. . But I believe there were more #2's sold than #4's (maybe?) Getting back to the question raised by the originator of this thread, there are a lot of #4 candidates for his loose nib to go into.

 

Cheers

Syd

 

Syd;

 

Agreed it is not what the poster was looking for but, it is an interesting topic. Most collectors have blinders on that lead to them only seeing the large pens because that is what collectors usually go after. Part of that is that we seem to like big and these are the rarer fish. My attack on a company is everything and I've noticed that guys know a lot about the big pens but the little ones go unnoticed. I think it is interesting to note that the #2 sized pen as determined in the 10's is what we generally accepted as the standard size pen. This standard was not static as the late 20's see an explosion in a much larger pen. Wahl was gone by the 1980's but, Sheaffer's Targa is almost identical to a #2 of the 10's! Taking this back to Wahls the Console for instance is almost always found in the 2 size. I would hold that if one bought everything they saw on EBay (as it has no show bias towards the large pens) you end up with more 2's than anything else. Rarely do we have anything like this but if we apply this to an earlier pen we do have this data. Of the 151 pens in the Boston database we have 103 2's or 68.2%. I would further speculate that the larger pens probably had a higher survivability rate but, as they cost more new, clearly a vaster number of 2's were sold as they still outnumber the large pens. I'll have to lean on Sheaffer here that there are in the late 20's more 3's than 5's and still fewer 7's (3-25's, 5-30's and 7-30's) though the 8 Lifetimes are very well represented. The 3-25 was a general replacement of the 22 Student Special or a #2 pen. Though I have less experience with Wahl my Tempoints are in greater numbers 2's.

 

Just an observation - I don't think 4's were the "norm" with 2's and even 3's being encountered more often.

 

Roger W.

 

No argument here, Roger. I wish I had not said "norm" in such an unlimited fashion. in the industry as a whole, vintage #2's produced and sold probably far outnumber all the higher number sizes combined. In the "standard size" Wahl Eversharp pens (the number 6 size barrels, for example and many #4 barrels) the number 4 nib was um, er, uh, normal. Since the thread focused on what Wahl -Eversharp pens will fit his number 4 nib, the number of number 2's did not enter my thinking as well it may should have . If my saying in an unqualified manner that the #4 was the "norm" is at issue, I wish I had said the pens that would take his #4 nib were very large in number and that he/she should expect to find many many survivors to put his #4 nib into instead. Last thing I want to cause is an uprising of supporters of undersung #2s. Some of my very best friends are #2 lovers.....If the issue is that I shold not have said Norm for #4 nibs in such an unqualified way...I yield, sir Knight.

 

So I still wonder what words are on the #4 nib in question.

 

 

Syd

Syd "the Wahlnut" Saperstein

Pensbury Manor

Vintage Wahl Eversharp Writing Instruments

Pensbury Manor

 

The WAHL-EVERSHARP Company

www.wahleversharp.com

New WAHL-EVERSHARP fountain and Roller-Ball pens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

So I still wonder what words are on the #4 nib in question.

 

 

Syd

 

Note the OP's second post (3rd overall in the string)... nib says "Wahl" and "4".

Just trying to help ;)

 

Tim

The only sense that's common is nonsense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35328
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30393
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...