Jump to content

Pelikan 400nn Gunther Wagner Vs Merz And Krell


1000km

Recommended Posts

I understand that Pelikan resumed production of the 400NN in the 1970s, with production by Merz and Krell. Interested in any further information you can share about the 1970s pens.

 

And how do you know which you've got? Looking at the photos on Rick's site I can't see any difference at all:

 

'Regular' 1950s 400NN

http://www.thepenguinpen.com/pelikan/fspelikan/PE1022.html

 

M&K 400NN

http://www.thepenguinpen.com/pelikan/fspelikan/PE992.html

Edited by 1000km
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1000km

    6

  • Sunburst

    3

  • Tombstone

    2

  • Sagar_C

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'm looking at my 400NN and there is a distinct ridge (step) at the piston knob and barrel.

I do not have an access to camera at this moment but you may want to google for close-up image of 400NN.

I saw few photos that shows the ridge on E-bay listing.

Edited by Sunburst
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 400NN has only a very slight ridge, and this is the case with all of the 400NNs I've ever seen, most of which I know to be Wagner pens.

Edited by 1000km
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when you have one in hand you feel the difference. The MK has a smooth end. You can pass the finger all over the body without perceiving any ridge. With the Pelikan the finger will feel the ridge.

 

Ciao,

<font face="Verdana"><b><font color="#2f4f4f">d</font></b><font color="#4b0082">iplo</font></font><br /><br /><a href='http://www.fountainpennetwork.com/forum/index.php?showuser=6228' class='bbc_url' title=''><font face="Trebuchet MS"><br /><font size="4"><b><font color="#8b0000"><font color="#696969">Go</font> <font color="#006400">To</font> <font color="#a0522d">My</font> <font color="#4b0082">FPN</font> Profile!</font></b></font></font><br /></a>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I can see a slight difference in the cap ring in the first two sites. The 400NN has one that slightly tilts inwards, while the M&K has one that is slightly tilted outwards. Maybe I'm just crazy, but it looks to be that case, thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I understand that Pelikan resumed production of the 400NN in the 1970s, with production by Merz and Krell. Interested in any further information you can share about the 1970s pens.

 

And how do you know which you've got? Looking at the photos on Rick's site I can't see any difference at all:

 

'Regular' 1950s 400NN

http://www.thepengui...kan/PE1022.html

 

M&K 400NN

http://www.thepengui...ikan/PE992.html

 

Is Merz and Krell less desirable than its counterpart? I think I just bought one M&K for €34; hope it is worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Is Merz and Krell less desirable than its counterpart? I think I just bought one M&K for €34; hope it is worth it."

Judging from the Merz & Krell Pelikan 120 that I own, M&K are superior to Pelikan.....now if only they'd made the 120 with stainless steel fittings like an Estie, instead of gold plated......sigh. :blush:

Fountain Pens.

Senator 721 piston filler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Compared to the 1956-65 Gunther Wagner Pelikan 400NN, the 1970s Merz & Krell 400NN has:


  •  
  • A shorter barrel
  • A slightly longer blind cap, which leads smoothly from the barrel
  • A shorter cap thread
  • A different style of nib, feed and collar
  • The stripes in the ink window are more blue-green
     

M&K 400NN top, Gunther Wagner 400NN bottom

post-21414-0-40289000-1361899721.jpg

M&K 400NN top, Gunther Wagner 400NN bottom

post-21414-0-11463300-1361899742.jpg

M&K 400NN top, Gunther Wagner 400NN bottom

post-21414-0-57837700-1361899791.jpg

M&K 400NN nib left, Gunther Wagner 400NN nib right

post-21414-0-95523100-1361899834.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A perfect comparison - but from my point of view you made a mistake in the caps:

 

Based on the first picture, the cap on the M&K belongs to the Wagner and vice versal.

 

You can see the difference also in the writing on the ring - the "400" comes in the more accurate way that the M&K's are known for... in fact I can also say it because I have a Wagner in front of me which is from 1961. Its family, because it was a present from my grandfather to my mother and my father with their names on it, and it has the cap with the clip you placed on the M&K...

There are no facts, there is no truth - just a data to be manipulated...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another comparison in tortoise form..

 

http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m188/kewlfly/photo2-16.jpg

 

http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m188/kewlfly/photo4-13.jpg

 

http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m188/kewlfly/photo4-14.jpg

 

http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m188/kewlfly/photo3-14.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The caps are correctly labelled - they aren't interchangeable.

 

That's interesting - in that case I have a Wagner with an M&K-Cap...

There are no facts, there is no truth - just a data to be manipulated...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The caps are correctly labelled - they aren't interchangeable.

 

That's interesting - in that case I have a Wagner with an M&K-Cap...

 

Like I say, the caps aren't interchangeable. The threads are quite different.

 

There are a wide variety of different imprints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I received a 400NN in black stripe today and found it to be M&K model.

 

The cap of M&K is triple threaded while G&W 400NN cap is quadruple threaded.

They are not at all interchangeable.

 

Also the filling knobs are different in shapes and in mechanisms.

I hope I can figure out.

 

 

Tor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35521
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31122
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27746
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Blog Comments

    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • alkman
      There is still chemistry for processing regular chrome (positive) films like Kodak Ektachrome and Fuji Velvia, but Kodachrome was a completely different and multistep beast. 
    • Ceilidh
      Ah, but how to get it processed - that is the question. I believe that the last machine able to run K-14 (Kodachrome processing) ceased to operate some 15 or so years ago. Perhaps the film will be worth something as a curiosity in my estate sale when I die. 😺
    • Mercian
      Take a lot of photos!   If the film has deteriorated or 'gone off' in any way, you can use that as a 'feature' to take 'arty' pictures - whether of landmarks, or people, or whatever.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...