Jump to content

Sesk Sets


macquid

Recommended Posts

In the case of the traditionally "big four" US brands it seems like one most often comes across Sheaffer desk sets, and after that Parker desk sets appear most often, followed by Wahl/Eversharp ones. Finally, Waterman desk sets seem to be the least prevalent...

 

This obviously is an indication of the relative number of desk sets that these companies sold over the years. Any ideas regarding why Sheaffer would have sold more desk sets than Parker, Parker more than Wahl/Eversharp, and why Waterman apparently sold so relatively few desk sets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • macquid

    3

  • Roger W.

    1

  • jar

    1

  • sotto2

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

I would imagine that Esterbrook was likely the largest supplier since they had many government and corporate accounts.

 

Also, during the period of the Desk Set, it looks like your order pretty much matches relative market share for pens anyway.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I just had to check in here to see if a "Sesk Set" was what I thought it was. It was. Thanks.

http://i59.tinypic.com/ekfh5f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would imagine that Esterbrook was likely the largest supplier since they had many government and corporate accounts.

 

Also, during the period of the Desk Set, it looks like your order pretty much matches relative market share for pens anyway.

 

Thanks Jar... Over the past +/- six months, considering only fountain pen desk sets, desk bases, desk pens or desk set/pen parts, the period from about 1925 through 1955 and using eBay offers as a barometer, I'm seeing relative proportions between these four brands of approx. 60% Sheaffer, 30% Parker, 10% Wahl/Eversharp and only a negligible proportion of Watermans. Does this tie into their average overall market shares for the period?

Edited by macquid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheaffer was the leader in desk bases. The guys that held the patents on desk bases were Sheaffer, Parker and Wahl. To stop patents fights amongst themselves and to control the market those three created the Pen Desk Set Company in late 1928 (incorparated January 21, 1929). This corporation was dissolved in 1950 as desk bases were no longer important. The golden age of desk bases is from inception 1925 until the US entered the war in 1941. During that period Sheaffer had 706 different desk bases which I have documented and several more that are not documented so the number could approach 1,000. Parker seems to have appraoched the desk base market from a high end view as they have larger and more elaborate bases than Sheaffer ever produced. Wahl was concentrating on pocket pens just to keep up with Sheaffer ad Parker and by the end of the desk base era were in decline as a corporation so their effort in desk bases was marginalized earlier than the rest. There were lots of other makers but Sheaffer made sure they dominated the low and middle range so other offerings are limited at best.

 

Roger W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sheaffer was the leader in desk bases. The guys that held the patents on desk bases were Sheaffer, Parker and Wahl. To stop patents fights amongst themselves and to control the market those three created the Pen Desk Set Company in late 1928 (incorparated January 21, 1929). This corporation was dissolved in 1950 as desk bases were no longer important. The golden age of desk bases is from inception 1925 until the US entered the war in 1941. During that period Sheaffer had 706 different desk bases which I have documented and several more that are not documented so the number could approach 1,000. Parker seems to have appraoched the desk base market from a high end view as they have larger and more elaborate bases than Sheaffer ever produced. Wahl was concentrating on pocket pens just to keep up with Sheaffer ad Parker and by the end of the desk base era were in decline as a corporation so their effort in desk bases was marginalized earlier than the rest. There were lots of other makers but Sheaffer made sure they dominated the low and middle range so other offerings are limited at best.

 

Roger W.

 

Thanks Roger, VERY INTERESTING!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35652
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31616
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...