Jump to content

8, "Ne Plus Ultra", Again,


rhr

Recommended Posts

Here are some more Ne-Plus-Ultras. Trademark no. 05563, Reynolds & Reynolds, "Inks", Jan 22, 1878, used since 1876, for a complex label with a crescent, a cross, a globe, the words "Ne Plus Ultra Of 1876" and "Self Copying Ink" within a diamond shape, and the firm name beneath. There are also other trademarks that are synonyms for "nothing more beyond", or "none better than". Trademark no. 11513, George F. King, "Steel Pens", Sept 23, 1884, used since 1876, for the word "Nonpareil". Trademark no. 32464, Carter's Ink Co., "Ideal Carbon Paper", Feb 7, 1899, used since July 1892, for the words "Facile Princeps", or "Easily First". Trademark no. 35048, L. E. Waterman Co., "Fountain-Pens", Sept 18, 1900, used since July 1, 1883, for the word "Ideal". The word also appeared in about 13 other subsequent Waterman's trademarks. An illustrated ad in the Scientific American, Apr 13, 1889, p.238, shows a pen with the words "Waterman's Ideal Pen" on the barrel. It's similar to this one on Olle Hjort's website, also from 1889. I think the "5, 89" in the ad means May 1889. Waterman most likely took out this trademark and US trademark no. 49715, in response to such uses of the word "Ideal" as the ones in Carter trademark no. 32,464 above, and "The Ideal Scrap Book" in US patent nos. 675,226 and 683,632, and the whole climate of such copycat trademarks as "Apex", "Champion", "Climax", "Clymax", "Klymax", "Crown", "Eclipse", "Idea", "Paragon", "Triumph", "Universal", and "Zenith", and many other superlative names and exaggerated claims.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

 

If you want to perform the trademark searches yourselves, simply cut and paste, or type the trademark numbers into the search window in the

Trademark Document Retrieval Portlet. --G.

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    2

  • antoniosz

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks, Antonios. I'm enjoying this as well, but I could use a bit more time, too. ;~)

 

:ninja:

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30436
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...