Jump to content

18, The Vanishing Point and Parker 51 Snorkels


rhr

Recommended Posts

The Snorkel pen is about as close as Sheaffer got to producing a vanishing point, or did it? Maybe it got closer than that.

 

Did you ever wonder whether you could write with the snorkel part of a Sheaffer Snorkel pen? Now, come on, admit it. Okay then, you don't have to speak up, but how about this? Did you ever actually try writing with the snorkel? No? Well, I did, once. It didn't work very well, very scratchy, and very blobby. :-) Well, there IS a Sheaffer patent for a fountain pen with a vanishing nib, and one that's about as close as you'll ever get to writing with the snorkel itself.

 

It's patent no. 2,949,887, and it's a shame it was never put into production. Has anyone ever seen one? The nib is tubular, sort of like a Parker 51 nib, and the snorkel is a concentric tube that fits snuggly inside the nib, just barely sliding within this outer shell, and it acts like the feed for the nib. Both tubes slide out of the shroud together just enough to expose the nib for writing, but not for filling the pen. The snorkel slides out further separately for filling. The images for this patent are gorgeous and highly detailed.

 

Who would have thunk it? A Capless Sheaffer Snorkel Vanishing Point! It's about as crazy as the frankenpen Parker 51 with a snorkel filler that's illustrated in patent no. 2,799,247. It's actually demonstrated being filled from a Sheaffer "Top Well" ink bottle! I can't claim finding this one. Tim Barker found it and pointed it out a few years ago on the Zoss List.

 

These are for all the Sheaffer collectors out there, and all the Vanishing Point enthusiasts out there, and all the Parker collectors as well.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

P.S. I found an interesting related patent for a Parker "61". But instead of posting about it here, I'll start a new thread tomorrow.

 

:ph34r:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    2

  • jonro

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

A Sheaffer vanishing point, if only. Perhaps they were going to attempt to compete against the ballpoint. They certainly wouldn't have been able to do it by price. That pen looks like it would have been fairly expensive to produce. I guess the patents have expired on that, so we could use the patent plans to produce one today. Now that would make a really interesting limited edition series, the unmade pens from the Big 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jon,

 

Now, there's a great idea for a real limited edition! If you wanted to use the patent plans to reproduce one of these pens, or any other unproduced pen patent, here's a company that specializes in just the thing, the Kennedy Trimnell Modelshop. Here's their website, which has been active since 1997, http://www.for-inventors.com/. Click on "Inventors Working Prototypes", and you get this webpage, http://www.for-inventors.com/inventors.html. I'd love to see what they would come up with.

 

As I looked through all these patents, I've been tempted a few times, but it would probably be pricey. ;~)

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30436
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...