Jump to content

Five and a half blues compared


BillTheEditor

Recommended Posts

This is the "Blue" page from my notebook, scanned and color-corrected.

 

It is hard to tell here, but you can actually tell that PR Midnight Blues and Levenger Cobalt Blue ARE blue, but they are very dark.

 

Notice the difference between the "old" Quink Blue and the new.

 

I need to add Noodler's Boston Brahmin Blue and Parker Penman Sapphire to this page, and will re-post when I've done that. The Boston Brahmin would be the lightest blue, and the Sapphire would be very similar (in the scan) to Cobalt Blue. I also need to add PR Sonic Blue when I get a chance, now that I think about it.

 

None of these inks feathered on this paper. All of them show through the paper, and the PR Midnight Blues, the Cobalt Blue, and the Quink from the Esterbrook 9314-B actually came through the paper slightly.

 

(Added: Dang! I forgot -- I have a bottle of PR Lake Placid Blue as well, that will need to be added. How could I forget? My favorite blue!)

 

(Edited to correct a reference to the manufacture of Parker Quink, which is not made in Slovenia.)

post-35-1153541032_thumb.jpg

Edited by BillTheEditor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • BillTheEditor

    3

  • *david*

    1

  • RonB

    1

  • The Bantam Scribbler

    1

Are Parker inks made in Slovenia now too? Or why does it say pre-Slovenian?

You know, maybe they are not made in Slovenia. Probably my mistake. I will correct the information if that is the case. However, the cartridge ink that I used in the 45 for these samples was purchased in 1998. Something changed! The ink from the bottle I just bought looks very different compared to those carts.

 

(I edited the scan in the first post to correct my error. Parker Quink is not made in Slovenia.)

Edited by BillTheEditor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the scan! I enjoy looking at ink comparisons.

 

Ron

Ron

 

Favorite Pens: Parker "51"Lamy 2000; Bexley America the Beautiful; Pilot Custom 823, 912 and 74; Sheaffer Early Touchdown; Parker Vacumatic; Sheaffer Legacy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the blue's!

"But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Rom. 5:8, NKJV)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

. . . . [T]he cartridge ink that I used in the 45 for these samples was purchased in 1998. Something changed! The ink from the bottle I just bought looks very different compared to those carts.

Blue comparisons are always helpful. Thanks, Bill B) !

 

Is the good-looking ink in your pre-1999 Parker Quink Blue cartridges "permanent" rather than "washable," perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Mini add-on:

IMO Sailor Jentle Ink blue is close to the pre-1999 Quink Blue because it is a bit lighter and has a bit of a gray touch. The current Quink Blue (non-washable) is lighter than all of the others, about as light as the washable blue you scanned. The current washable is even lighter.

 

Mike

Edited by lapis

Life is too short to drink bad wine (Goethe)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comparisons, Bill!

 

I actually think your handwriting is terrific! Not "crummy" by any stretch of the imagination.

Edited by The Bantam Scribbler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35589
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31446
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • alkman
      There is still chemistry for processing regular chrome (positive) films like Kodak Ektachrome and Fuji Velvia, but Kodachrome was a completely different and multistep beast. 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...