Jump to content

Hero 330


mstone

Recommended Posts

post-11101-1230424882_thumb.jpg

 

First impressions: 5

 

Another cheap pen. This one inspired by the Parker 61. Hooded nib, thin trim ring, with an arrow on the hood.

 

Appearance/Design: 4

 

This is a very cheap pen. Sharp edges on the plastic, parts out of alignment, a seam where the plastic end cap meets the barrel. The gold colored cap is very light, and the clip is attached by tabs in the cap rather than a rivet or screw. The sliver colored plastic ring between the section and barrel is uneven. We seem to be approaching the bottom end of how cheaply a fountain pen can be made. This pen does have the transparent threads seen on other Hero's, but not the transparent clutch ring. (There is no clutch ring at all.)

 

post-11101-1230424900_thumb.jpg

 

Weight & Dimensions: 5

 

It's slightly larger than the hero 616, but still smaller and lighter than a 51. Too small for extended writing for someone with larger hands.

 

Nib and performance: 5

 

Dry, fine writer. Gold plated steel nib, hooded. A slittle rough, but that's nothing out of the ordinary for something this dry & fine. Reliable starter, consistent performance. No spring at all.

 

post-11101-1230424946_thumb.jpg

 

Filling system: 4

 

Has an integrated filler, but does not fill as well as the 616. I've read that this pen has a breather tube, but I can't see it. I'll try to remember to update this review next time I flush the pen and look for a breather tube.

 

Cost/Value: 5

 

It's only a couple of bucks, but it's possible to get better quality in the same price range (e.g., the Hero 616).

 

Conclusion: 5

 

The 330 is very close to the 616, but for almost the same money I'd prefer the 616. The cap on the latter seems much more solid, and the 330 lacks some small details that make the 616 interesting. I'm also not a fan of scattering cheap gold colored accents on a pen (e.g., the cap & arrow on the 330). That said, style is very subjective and the 616 and the 330 are almost identical writers. I can see that some might prefer the 330, and it does do what it's supposed to do (write).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • lovemy51

    1

  • mstone

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

thanx for the review. one thing i hate about this pen is the cheap cap... man, it kills me. on the other hand i love the nib smoothness, that's why i much prefer the 329 (old version with the star-trek symbol), it has a better cap and the same nib.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35347
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30428
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...