Jump to content

Hero 750 and Wing Sung 712 review


Asian8640

Recommended Posts

Hi! This is my first review. It might not be great, it might not be up to your standards, but heck, I can only say as much as i know. Anyway, my first fountain pens arrived one week ago from isellpens.com. As previously mentioned in the title, they happened to be a Hero 750 and a Wing Sung 712. First off, the costs of these two pens are, in my opinion, are miles apart, considering the price of the Hero 750 is %650 of the Wing Sung 712. As for actual prices, the Hero 750 cost thirteen dollars and the Wing Sung cost me two dollars. Cheap right? Considering I don't have a steady source of income since my occupation is a student, this happens to be hefty sum for me. Meh. Not important. Anyway, the quality difference between these two pens is miles apart. Since Wing Sung was a company that was absorbed by Hero during the late twentieth century (don't remember exactly when) and this is probably one of their later models, it can be assumed that the quality of the Wing Sung pens were decreasing since the company had fallen on hard times, or that the quality was not too good to begin with. The Wing Sung has a fine point iridium tipped hooded nib. As for thickness,it writes a consistent fine line, but has constant problems of skipping. It's an aerometric fill and one very leaky pen. I left it sitting around for no more than half an hour, and it began to leak. I have no idea where it came from and it persists sporadically. The cap is some sort of metal brushed with gold and the clip is nice and springy. The body of the pen is a thin plastic, but by no means fragile. Aside from the inner leak, the ink does not leak out of the body. For two dollars, I would not recommend it, though the leak could just be a problem with this specific piece. Sorry, there are no photos of this pen. For photos, go to isellpens.com and check out the Wing Sung link. The Hero 750 is a very stylish pen. It is a light/medium weight pen made completely of plastic and some sort of gold plated metal (probably copper or steel alloy underneath). It is very sturdy and has a consistently fine nib with no skipping whatsoever and writes fine after days of sitting around. The body is a black lacquer with gold accents while the cap is accented in gold with vertical silver stripes a springy silver/gold two toned clip. More on the nib... It is a steel nib plated in gold and nicely engraved with the Hero logo. It writes more on the dry side and works well with Pelikan Brilliant Black 4001 ink. The downside is that the Brilliant Black is not so brilliant on this pen. It is more of a dark gray, though this can be seen as a positive point meaning that it is less of an ink guzzler. As with most moderately expensive to expensive Hero pens, it fills via converter and accepts international cartridges, though i have yet to test long international cartridges. Bottled ink is recommended with this pen since it seems to have a sticky time with the cartridges. Maybe I'll try again sometime. Ok. Hoped that review was up to acceptable standards.

 

P.S. Sorry, I will attach pictures at a later time. I can't seem to upload them. <Sigh> Aww well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • MYU

    1

  • Asian8640

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

You can link photos that are hosted externally. Actually, this usually works out better. Try using a photo sharing website Picasa, Flickr or PhotoBucket.

 

Also, please see about using our Pen Review Guideline for a more logical structure. It'll help you focus your thoughts and bring out the pros/cons more clearly. Thanks...

Edited by MYU

[MYU's Pen Review Corner] | "The Common Ground" -- Jeffrey Small

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35350
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30431
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...