Jump to content

K W Z I - Konrad - #54 - Iron Gall - Blue Black Or Test Ig Blue


Tas

Recommended Posts

Previously incorrectly posted in the KWZI #22 post but I have since been reliably informed by the maker himself that it's not #22.

Either way its a fabulous ink that I've totally enjoyed using and am already sadly missing :mellow:

 

http://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_kwzi_22_rhodia.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_kwzi_22_swatch.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_essri_swatch.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_akkerman_10_swatch.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_salix_swatch.jpg

 

(Apologies for not showing Akkerman's No 10 on the sheet. Despite it being my favourite ink I don't seem to have it loaded in a pen. :blush:
It usually lives in my bulletproof Sheaffer Intrigue but ESSRI has been squatting that recently . . .)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tas

    4

  • alarickc

    2

  • inkstainedruth

    1

  • Bemo

    1

  • 3 weeks later...

Okay. This is the other ink I was kindly sent that is also 54 Iron Gall Blue Black or Test IG Blue . . .

 

This is MY FAVOURITE COLOURED KWZI BLUE INK that I've been fortunate enough to test but sadly spilt 1/2 the vial in a poor filling session with my Nib Creeper.

 

In many of my pens my current fave blue black, Mont Blanc Midnight Blue, is effectively black when used to write with. This ink is clearly a very dark and gorgeous blue black.

 

I guess it's similar to ESSRI and Akkerman's No 10 in colour only this remains a dark blue and doesn't turn almost black. I am a little confused as I always believed IG inks to have good water resistance. This ink sadly doesn't but is for me THE blue black I've been looking for. Love it. No staining either, so my ink window will be clear, yippee . . .

 

http://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_kwzi_ig54_or_testigblue_rhodia.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_kwzi_ig54_or_testigblue_swatch.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_mbmb_original_paris.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_rk_leipziger_shcwarz_swatch.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_essri_swatch.jpghttp://www.taskyprianou.com/fpn_akkerman_10_swatch.jpg

Edited by Tas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I just inked up a Pilot Metropolitan with the final version of this and I am in love. Beautiful, wet, lubricated, and nicely shady. I think I finally have a blue-black to compete with Bung Box 4B for my affections.

IMG_1178.jpeg.e0dbec8c08b32c0f0a13228a0e4b78fa.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent.

 

I bought a bottle of his final formula IG Blue No 4 and IG Blue Black and they've gone straight to the top of the Blue Black pile.

KWZI - he da man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like #54 a whole lot -- but I read in another thread that this is, according to Konrad, archival. I didn't think it was quite as water resistant as I would have expected from that description (I used a diluted highlighter ink over it and it started to fuzz up underneath the highlighter ink -- think feathering, only the ink was in theory already dry; ditto when I tried dampening a dry written sample).

Other than that, the ink behaved beautifully -- no spread, feathering, show through, and reasonable flow even though IG inks tend to be on the dry side.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

"It's very nice, but frankly, when I signed that list for a P-51, what I had in mind was a fountain pen."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like #54 a whole lot -- but I read in another thread that this is, according to Konrad, archival. I didn't think it was quite as water resistant as I would have expected from that description (I used a diluted highlighter ink over it and it started to fuzz up underneath the highlighter ink -- think feathering, only the ink was in theory already dry; ditto when I tried dampening a dry written sample).

Other than that, the ink behaved beautifully -- no spread, feathering, show through, and reasonable flow even though IG inks tend to be on the dry side.

Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth

From messing with it I'm thinking that the blue dye in the ink is very washable. The blackish line left behind, the IG part, is a lot darker than with other IG's I've seen. I think that that is the archival part, the high IG content. The dye probably isn't archival.

IMG_1178.jpeg.e0dbec8c08b32c0f0a13228a0e4b78fa.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35333
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30406
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...