Jump to content

Pelikan logo with four chicks


simp

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a doubt about the year that the Pelikan logo with four chicks was introduced.

 

The Pelikan history brochure, downloadable from here:

 

http://www.pelikan.com/pulse/vfs-public/pd...torie_e_412.pdf

 

reports the 1926, but the Werner Rüttinger site, in this page:

 

http://www.ruettinger-web.de/e-pelikan-modell-100n.html

 

reports 1924.

 

So does anyone have any kind of explaination for this difference ?

 

Simone

Fountain Pen Wiki - www.FountainPen.it

Fountain pen Chronology (need help to improve...)

Old advertisement (needing new ones to enlarge the gallery...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • simp

    3

  • Rick Propas

    2

  • DougS

    1

I would tend to accept the information from Pelikan as correct.

 

Hi,

 

I have a doubt about the year that the Pelikan logo with four chicks was introduced.

 

The Pelikan history brochure, downloadable from here:

 

http://www.pelikan.com/pulse/vfs-public/pd...torie_e_412.pdf

 

reports the 1926, but the Werner Rüttinger site, in this page:

 

http://www.ruettinger-web.de/e-pelikan-modell-100n.html

 

reports 1924.

 

So does anyone have any kind of explaination for this difference ?

 

Simone

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the Pelikan pdf history file you referenced is merely showing the logo style as seen at some random points in time, not specifically the introduction dates for that style. Obviously, because they introduced the two chick logo well before the 1957 date shown. I can't verify Werner's date but that's usually very good information he has.

 

That's my explanation and I'm stickin' to it.

 

--Doug

 

 

 

http://www.pelikan.com/pulse/vfs-public/pd...torie_e_412.pdf

 

reports the 1926, but the Werner Rüttinger site, in this page:

 

http://www.ruettinger-web.de/e-pelikan-modell-100n.html

 

reports 1924.

 

So does anyone have any kind of explaination for this difference ?

 

Simone

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the Pelikan pdf history file you referenced is merely showing the logo style as seen at some random points in time, not specifically the introduction dates for that style. Obviously, because they introduced the two chick logo well before the 1957 date shown. I can't verify Werner's date but that's usually very good information he has.

 

That's my explanation and I'm stickin' to it.

 

--Doug

 

I got two answer and they disagree but ... Because the date of 1957 for the two chicks logo is surely totally wrong, I also tend to agree to your explanation, so I'll put 1924 in my Chronology (and a reference to this discussion).

 

Thanks

Simone

Fountain Pen Wiki - www.FountainPen.it

Fountain pen Chronology (need help to improve...)

Old advertisement (needing new ones to enlarge the gallery...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this will help from a 2008 catalogue to accompany a Pelikan exhibit in Hannover produced in cooperation with the company.

 

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b77/rickp/Untitled-2.jpg

Thank you for the picture, that's very interesting info.

 

The 1938 seems consistent with the Ruettinger web site, but the date for the old logo here is back to 1922. Now I have some more doubts...

 

Regards

Simone

Fountain Pen Wiki - www.FountainPen.it

Fountain pen Chronology (need help to improve...)

Old advertisement (needing new ones to enlarge the gallery...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35328
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30393
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...