Jump to content

Urushi and Light


SincerelySpicy

Recommended Posts

I was looking around on google scholar doing some searches about urushi in scholarly journals and I came across a study of the effects of light on urushi and I thought it would be a good thing to relay the knowledge.

 

Essentially, it is not recommended to leave urushi objects exposed to, not just UV light, but visible light for extended periods of time, if one wants to maintain the color and glossiness of the urushi surface. However, exposure to visible and minor amounts of UV light does not seem to have any significant effect on the mechanical properties such as hardness.

 

This was not a test of whether urushi is effected by Ultraviolet light, as it has been proven that urushi is significantly degraded by exposure to large amounts of ultraviolet radiation, but was a test of whether exposure to visible light effects urushi. The study was done to determine the effects of constant light exposure on urushi for display purposes in museums.

 

 

 

The study tested several properties and their changes through exposure to fluorescent light. The control was urushi that was kept unexposed to all light, and the variables were exposure to direct light (fluorescent tube, with UV peaks around 310 and 370nm, and peaks in the visible spectrum at around 400, 430, 500, 550 and 580nm), exposure through glass and exposure through acrylic. (each of these block slightly differing ranges of invisible light, and both block nearly all UV light with a wavelength shorter than 400nm) The exposure time was up to 5000 continuous hours.

 

The visual properties tested were, color and relative gloss. The mechanical properties tested were, hardness, tensile strength and the elastic modulus.

 

The results indicate that the properties change over time and exposure in this manner:

 

Color: There is a 3-5% color change with the greatest change in the direct exposure and the smallest change with exposure through glass. The control had no change.

 

Relative Gloss: There was a significant reduction in relative gloss of up to 10 percent over the full exposure period and there was no significant difference between direct exposure, exposure through glass, and exposure through acrylic. The control had no change.

 

Hardness: There was no significant difference between the control and variables, and the hardness in all samples increased over time.

 

Tensile Strength: There was no significant difference between the control and variables, and the tensile strength in all samples decreased over time.

 

Elastic Modulus: There was no significant difference between the control and variables, and the elastic modulus in all samples increased over time.

 

The conclusion was that urushi lacquer is effected by visible light as well as ultraviolet light in its color and gloss, however its physical properties are not effected by the presence of visible and minor amounts of ultraviolet light.

 

Citation:

Toshio Ogawa, Kazutaka Arai, Satoshi Osawa.

"Light Stability of Oriental Lacquer Films Irradiated by a Fluorescent Lamp."

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

http://www.springerlink.com/content/n702360v8774m06x/

 

Ern.

Edited by SJM1123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Phthalo

    1

  • SincerelySpicy

    1

  • gyrosan

    1

  • rubyeyespenlover

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks, it's very interesting.

 

I have many urushi's pen and they are changing a little bit with the time : Great!!!!

post-24335-1241092646.jpg

69 th D a n i t r i o F e l l o w s h i p p e r - Montblanc WE Lover - NAMIKI addicted

http://www.pennamagazine.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35571
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31313
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Blog Comments

    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • alkman
      There is still chemistry for processing regular chrome (positive) films like Kodak Ektachrome and Fuji Velvia, but Kodachrome was a completely different and multistep beast. 
    • Ceilidh
      Ah, but how to get it processed - that is the question. I believe that the last machine able to run K-14 (Kodachrome processing) ceased to operate some 15 or so years ago. Perhaps the film will be worth something as a curiosity in my estate sale when I die. 😺
    • Mercian
      Take a lot of photos!   If the film has deteriorated or 'gone off' in any way, you can use that as a 'feature' to take 'arty' pictures - whether of landmarks, or people, or whatever.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...