Jump to content

Nib Noise


Richard

Recommended Posts

I've mailed out Nib Noise for October 2007.

 

Nib Noise is a free monthly e-newsletter from Richard's pens. This month's issue included notice of some very nice pens we have available along with republication of four reference articles from my Pentrace Pen Doctor column and an essay by Don Fluckinger about what pens might be collectible in 2050.

 

We send Nib Noise only to people who have asked for it -- it isn't spam. If you are not currently a subscriber, you can subscribe by visiting our site's Free Email Newsletter page:

 

Free Email Newsletter

 

If you have subscribed but are not receiving Nib Noise, it's possible that your mailbox is full or your spam filter is rejecting the message with some sort of automated reply. When a reply like this comes back or when mail appears undeliverable, our list server automatically deletes you from the list. Please feel free to re-subscribe -- but check your spam filter first! :)

Edited by Richard

sig.jpg.2d63a57b2eed52a0310c0428310c3731.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Richard

    1

  • jpolaski

    1

  • HLeopold

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

I've mailed out Nib Noise for October 2007.

 

Nib Noise is a free monthly e-newsletter from Richard's pens. This month's issue included notice of some very nice pens we have available along with republication of four reference articles from my Pentrace Pen Doctor column and an essay by Don Fluckinger about what pens might be collectible in 2050.

 

We send Nib Noise only to people who have asked for it -- it isn't spam. If you are not currently a subscriber, you can subscribe by visiting our site's Free Email Newsletter page:

 

Free Email Newsletter

 

If you have subscribed but are not receiving Nib Noise, it's possible that your mailbox is full or your spam filter is rejecting the message with some sort of automated reply. When a reply like this comes back or when mail appears undeliverable, our list server automatically deletes you from the list. Please feel free to re-subscribe -- but check your spam filter first! :)

 

Thanks for mentioning this, Richard, I had somehow missed it all the times I have been to your web-site.

Harry Leopold

“Prints of Darkness”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got to say, this newsletter has been a wealth of information to me. I've been subscribed to it since before I found this forum. Anyone who doesn't receive it should really ask why :)

"The older I get, the more I realize I'm getting older".

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35336
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30417
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...