Jump to content

Montblanc 344 Celluloid Early Model


Marijan

Recommended Posts

I got this 344 MB. It is early celluloid model, with wrong steel nib that has to be replaced. Piston is in perfect working condition.

 

fpn_1327926353__1.jpg

fpn_1327926406__2.jpg

 

When I was cleaning 342 (later version) few days ago, I had no problem removing (unscrewing) the nib out of the section. Few ultrasound baths and it went out.

 

Does early, celluloid models MB 344 have friction fit nib/fed or is it the same as on the later model 342?

On the parts list, posted once here, there are both models (only later ones) and both seems to have screwed nib.

 

Early model 344 has no nib removing tool slots on the nib section as seen on the photo.

 

fpn_1327926445__3.jpg

 

Another thing is the piston mechanism. What type of mechanism the early 344 have? I was confused about the fill cap. On 342 the cap is going back when moving in "fill" position, on 344 it stays in place (look photograph). Both work perfectly. I couldn't find reference yet, just a mentioning of something like "direct mechanism"!?

 

fpn_1327926492__4.jpg

 

One more thing. I am reluctant to put the cap with it`s colored engraving in the ultrasound. I have a feeling that color can simply pop out after few baths? Is my fear justified or is it safe perhaps, to do that ?

 

Thank you on advance.

 

Best regards!

Marijan Radaljac

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Marijan

    3

  • psychobabble

    1

  • Maxpens

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Marijan,

 

these pens are different because of the different production year. Everything looks fine with your pens and is matching to the age / year of production. I woud say we speak about 20 years difference.

 

kind regards

 

Max

HANDMADE PENS : www.astoriapen.hamburg ; REPAIRSERVICE : www.maxpens.de ; by MONTBLANC recommended repair service for antique pens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Marijan,

 

these pens are different because of the different production year. Everything looks fine with your pens and is matching to the age / year of production. I woud say we speak about 20 years difference.

 

kind regards

 

Max

 

Hi Max,

 

sorry for confusion, I just forgot to post the photo of the nib itself. 342 does have original MB steel nib, as it should be, but 344 has steel nib signed "Iridstar-Cromepen" not Montblanc 344.

That is why I ask about the nib feed removal. I would like to get either steel or 14k MB 344 nib to replace this one. Steel would probably be the more correct one to the period?

 

What production year do you think this 344 is?

 

Thank you for taking time to answer.

 

Best regards!

Marijan Radljac

 

fpn_1327996894__5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Marijan,

 

I have a 3-44G, probably one that is later compared to yours. It has the flat feed with the grooves like yours, but it also has the nib removing tool slots like the 342 in your picture. I have two 342 pens and they have the same slots as well.

 

My cap has the gold ring at the edge of the cap instead of having the black resin at the end like yours, so it must be a later version.

 

The piston fill cap does not telescope out when in the fill position.

 

Hope this helps.

Regards, Stephen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Stephen,

 

thank you, everything is most helpful when trying to learn about something "chameleon like", as these MB`s can be :mellow: .

 

So far, I found out that there is few things on this pen that can be used as a quite safe indicator when determining is it an earliest, early , later or the latest model. First listed are usually found in early models. Grip section which can be curved or flat, ink window, yellowish / orange or blue, cap ring inside, away from the edge or one sitting on the edge, engraved MB logo on the cap or without it, engraved/color filed or usual "in one piece" star on the clip cap, ski slope flat ebonite nib or the later one like on that 342... Screwed feed friction fit nib is probably there too. Piston difference like on these to (344 and 342).

 

And all combinations of these of course :wacko:

 

Nothing of this data I found all around really helped to get sure how my nib is secured in that nib section (but it was fun and educative). I guess it is friction.

It is sitting in the water that is covering the beginning of the nib section. Third day now. Few ultrasound baths. It is not moving, but again, I am doing this gently. If it doesn't go in few more days I will send it to the specialist for nib replacement. I have no temp. controlled heat gun, so I will not attempt any invasive methods.

 

Which BM`s used to have this kind of piston mechanism? 13x series?

 

Thanks Stephen.

 

Best regards!

Marijan Radaljac

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35640
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31576
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27747
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...