Jump to content

17, Ink Blotters & Lightning Bolts,


rhr

Recommended Posts

Trademark no. 15636, H S. Crocker & Co., "Blotting-Paper In Sheets And Pads", June 26, 1888, used since May 1888, is for the word "Electric" and a hand holding a bundle of lightning bolts. Trademark no. 15706, Thaddeus Davids Co., "Inks", July 24, 1888, used since June 4, 1888, is for the words "Electro Chemical" and an image of a lightning bolt. Trademark no. 33699, Charles W. McCrossan, "Preparation For Removing Ink Stains, &c.", Nov 7, 1899, used since July 1, 1899, is for the words "Magic Lightning" and a hand emerging from a cloud and holding a bottle from which a lightning bolt emerges and cleans a path through an ink stain. Actually, "Nepenthe" would make a great name for an ink eradicator. Trademark no. 15997, Joseph Parker & Son, "Blotting-Paper", Nov 13, 1888, used since 1869, is for the words "Commercial Blotting" and an image of a steamship. [ Sorry, Len. No relation to George S. ;~) ] Trademark no. 15998, Joseph Parker & Son, "Blotting-Paper", Nov 13, 1888, used since 1860, is for the words "Treasury Blotting". Trademark no. 21612, Eaton, Dikeman & Co., "Blotting-Paper", Aug 16, 1892, used since 1891, is for the word "Columbian". Trademark no. 21613, Eaton, Dikeman & Co., "Blotting-Paper", Aug 16, 1892, used since 1891, is for the word "Magnet". Trademark no. 35824, District Of Columbia Paper Mfg. Co., "Tinted Blotting-Paper", Jan 29, 1901, used since Jan 1, 1901, is for the word "Flora". Trademark no. 50159, Standard Paper Mfg. Co., "Blotting-Paper", Mar 6, 1906, used since July 1, 1902, is for the word "Imperial" enclosed in quotation marks. Trademark no. 60945, Standard Paper Mfg. Co., "Blotting-Paper", Feb 26, 1907, used since Sept 1, 1906, is for the word "Curi-Curl".

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

 

If you want to perform the trademark searches, simply cut and paste, or type the trademark numbers into the search window in the Trademark Document Retrieval Portlet.

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35360
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30466
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • asota
      ...random aside - I still have some 30 rolls of unused, long-expired Kodachrome 64 film (35mm). They have been frozen since 2009. No idea why I have held on to them for this long, but I guess I'm hoping for a miracle. I too have never developed colour film but I still d&p my B&W to this day. As a passion, of course.  
    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...