Jump to content

6, Sanford-Ink & Wirt-Pen Hands,


rhr

Recommended Posts

Here are some pictures of hands using writing implements. Trademark no. 05241 was issued to Sanford Mfg. Co. for "Inks" on Oct 16, 1877, and used since 1874. It consists of an image of an upright keg of ink with the words "Sandford’s Ink" on the front, and with two hands drawing ink from a c-o-c-k-valve spigot into an inkwell. Paul E. Wirt's trademark no. 37034 for "Fountain-Pens", issued on Sept 10, 1901, and used since June 30, 1901, was for "the representation of a hand holding a fountain-pen", that is, "the figure of a hand is represented as being posed in a pen-grasping position" holding a fountain pen with a pregnant barrel. The illustration page is missing from the trademark, so I am including a link to a copy of an ad from the time that makes use of the trademark image. Compare it to the pens in the illustrations in US patent nos. 651,736, 651,737, and 651,738. I have a whole binder full of these kinds of patent images, about 300 of them, all showing hands in the act of writing. I mentioned a couple of them in my previous series in a segment about my publisher's symbol and printer's dingbats.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

 

If you want to perform the trademark searches yourselves, simply cut and paste, or type the trademark numbers into the search window in the Registration Certificate Portlet. --G.

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30436
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...