Jump to content

20, The First Snorkel Filler, Not A Sheaffer


rhr

Recommended Posts

Who was the first to come up with a snorkel filler? Sheaffer was the first to call it such, but was it first to come up with the tube-filler idea, or the "Don't get your nib dirty with ink" idea? Well, take a look at patent no. 1,548,502, the first snorkel filler, or rather precursor to the Sheaffer Snorkel Filler.

 

The patent specification reads in part, "One of the objects…is to provide…a self-filler having the peculiarity or characteristic of filling…itself without requiring a dipping of the pen proper [nib] into the ink. Another object is to provide a filling channel independently of the supplying channel for the [nib]". The snorkel is called a "filling tube" in this patent, but it's definitely a snorkel, even before Sheaffer's snorkel. The only original thing that the Sheaffer Pen Co. contributed to the snorkel filler was the name. If you don't know your own history, you're doomed to repeat it, or maybe they did know it, and stole the idea.

 

And then there's patent no. 2,603,189, another Snorkel precursor in which the snorkel is called a "filler needle". It was issued on July 15, 1952, then re-issued as patent no. RE23,683 on July 7, 1953 and assigned to the W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co., to buy out the competition in the business. Check out the interesting replacement of the word "pen" by the word "nib" in the re-issue.

 

And then there's the snorkel piston filler that Herbert Anders created for Wahl-Eversharp and that Len Provisor found, and that Fultz wrote about in Pen World, and which may never have been patented. And then there's the vanishing point snorkel that William Bunn created for Sheaffer, and that Sam Fiorella found the drawings for and wrote about in The Pennant, and which may never have been patented. I could find no patents in the EPO website that were issued to either Herbert Anders or William Bunn. I'll leave them for someone else to try to find, if they will be found at all.

 

The snorkel story ain't over yet.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30436
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...