Jump to content

11, The Waterman's Piston and Vacuum Fillers


rhr

Recommended Posts

Did Waterman ever produce a piston, or plunger, or pump filler in the 1930s? And how about a button-vac filler? Well, Parker had its Vacumatic with its diaphragm filler, so Waterman’s had to have its Ink-Vue with a diaphragm, even though theirs was lever-driven rather than plunger-rod activated. So why didn't Waterman have a vac filler as well? And Sheaffer and Pelikan had some very competitive piston fillers. So why didn't Waterman’s have a piston, or plunger, or pump filler? And if Waterman did have pump fillers, or vac fillers under development in the 1930s, but never put the pens into production, then how do you look for them? How can you look for them, when you don't know that they ever existed? And how can you look for 1930s patents when the word "pen" isn't used in the title of one of them? Well, the answer is you can't, unless you stumble upon them, and even then, they're only the patents for the pens, not the actual pens.

 

 

Well, here are a couple for all the Waterman's collectors out there. First of all, there's patent no. 1,967,580 for a pump filler that was assigned to Waterman's in 1934. The piston rod, or plunger had to be pumped several times to fill the pen. It was, as far as I know, never produced. Then there's a Waterman's button-activated vacuum filler in patent no. 2,139,084, also unproduced as far as I know. Has anyone ever seen one of either of these?

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    4

  • Ben Looijesteijn

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Over on Lion & Pen, David Nishimura pointed out the file application no. 15,044, filed April 6, 1935, mentioned in patent no. 2,139,084. File number applications are difficult to find, so I didn't follow up on it till this morning. This is the patent number for that one, 2,087,672, the Waterman's "Ink-Vue" lever-actuated bulb-vacuum filler.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here's an interesting piece of Canadian "Ink-Vue" ephemera, a pen that was sent back from the Waterman's repair department in Montreal as unfixable due to lack of repair parts.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

 

 

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v71/rhrpen/inkvue.jpg

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in a hurry, so I won't hyperlink all these patents, but you might also want to look at patent no. 2,068,419 for an interesting collapsed diaphragm Ink-Vue, and 2,162,223 for the "Lady Patricia" Ink-Vue plastic, and 2,217,755, the goofy, one-piece, Ink-Vue barrel that's HELL to fix!

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

hi George,

I know for sure that Watermans produced a piston filler in the '40s. I believe it was specially made for the Swiss market. I have two of those in my collection. Very nice pens!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35675
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      31729
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27748
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Misfit
      Oh to have that translucent pink Prera! @migo984 has the Oeste series named after birds. There is a pink one, so I’m assuming Este is the same pen as Oeste.    Excellent haul. I have some Uniball One P pens. Do you like to use them? I like them enough, but don’t use them too much yet.    Do you or your wife use Travelers Notebooks? Seeing you were at Kyoto, I thought of them as there is a store there. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It's not nearly so thick that I feel it comprises my fine-grained control, the way I feel about the Cross Peerless 125 or some of the high-end TACCIA Urushi pens with cigar-shaped bodies and 18K gold nibs. Why would you expect me or anyone else to make explicit mention of it, if it isn't a travesty or such a disappointment that an owner of the pen would want to bring it to the attention of his/her peers so that they could “learn from his/her mistake” without paying the price?
    • szlovak
      Why nobody says that the section of Tuzu besides triangular shape is quite thick. Honestly it’s the thickest one among my many pens, other thick I own is Noodler’s Ahab. Because of that fat section I feel more control and my handwriting has improved. I can’t say it’s comfortable or uncomfortable, but needs a moment to accommodate. It’s funny because my school years are long over. Besides this pen had horrible F nib. Tines were perfectly aligned but it was so scratchy on left stroke that collecte
    • stylographile
      Awesome! I'm in the process of preparing my bag for our pen meet this weekend and I literally have none of the items you mention!! I'll see if I can find one or two!
    • inkstainedruth
      @asota -- Yeah, I think I have a few rolls in my fridge that are probably 20-30 years old at this point (don't remember now if they are B&W or color film) and don't even really know where to get the film processed, once the drive through kiosks went away....  I just did a quick Google search and (in theory) there was a place the next town over from me -- but got a 404 error message when I tried to click on the link....  Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...