Jump to content

10, The Gravity Filler


rhr

Recommended Posts

Here's another Japanese pen patent, the Namiki, or Pilot gravity filler, patent no. 2,144,296.

 

And here's one of the ink bottles for the pen, with its distinctive cardioid shape, 2,132,313.

 

In the US patent for the Pilot filling bottle, the words "capillarity" and "gravity" do not appear. However, both words do appear, in the US patent for the Pilot fountain pen that is meant to be filled from this bottle. Throughout the specification, the phrase "capillarity and gravity" is used over and over. "The ink-ducts serve as passages for ink, which is sucked from the bottle into the casing, under the action of capillarity and gravity." But near the end, the specification makes a statement that clearly separates the two words. "In brief, in known fountain-pens, the idea has prevailed that capillarity should be regarded as of importance, whereas in this invention the idea is based on the fact that much more importance should be placed on gravity." One can never completely discount capillarity, but I think the pen is more properly called a gravity filler.

 

There's a gravity filler that preceded the Pilot pen, patent no. 2,001,263, and some earlier ones still, but I'll save them for later.

 

And here are a couple of Pilot ads showing the pen being filled from different bottles.

 

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v71/rhrpen/Pilotad16.jpg

 

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v71/rhrpen/Pilotad17.jpg

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ninja:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • rhr

    4

  • Johnny Appleseed

    1

  • wdyasq

    1

  • amberleadavis

    1

I like these two quotes from the specifications for the two pens. The Namiki patent states, "In known fountain-pens, the idea has prevailed that capillarity should be regarded as of importance, whereas in [this] invention the idea is based on the fact that much importance should be attached to gravity". And the Osterhout patent states, "The present invention...has for an object to provide an improved [fountain] pen that functions solely by the action of natural laws".

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks a lot like the filling system in the Pelikan Level 5 pen. I wonder what the relation is, and what patent the Level 5 uses?

 

John

So if you have a lot of ink,

You should get a Yink, I think.

 

- Dr Suess

 

Always looking for pens by Baird-North, Charles Ingersoll, and nibs marked "CHI"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "Level 5" fills under pressure, if I am not mistaken, and fills in any position. It does not have to be inverted to be filled by gravity.

 

I think this is the US patent for the "Level 5" pen and ink bottle, 5,888,008.

 

This is the German patent for the bottle, DE4438590, and this is the German patent for the filling valve, DE4340760.

 

George Kovalenko.

 

:ph34r:

Edited by rhr

rhrpen(at)gmail.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

The Level filing system is very different. If you can find a level, buy it. It's a wonderfully fun pen. If anyone has one of these here, I want to buy it.

Fountain pens are my preferred COLOR DELIVERY SYSTEM (in part because crayons melt in Las Vegas).

Create a Ghostly Avatar and I'll send you a letter. Check out some Ink comparisons: The Great PPS Comparison 

Don't know where to start?  Look at the Inky Topics O'day.  Then, see inks sorted by color: Blue Purple Brown Red Green Dark Green Orange Black Pinks Yellows Blue-Blacks Grey/Gray UVInks Turquoise/Teal MURKY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30440
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...