Jump to content

A Cross identification + logo


Liuna

Recommended Posts

Greetings, I acquired these black matte pen and pencil. The image search says these are Classic Centuries (or just Century if they are older?). They are my first Crosses, along with a faulty sterling silver.

They are made in USA and couldn't identify what logo this was on their clip (I know there ate company ligo ones as company gifts).

I see no plastic thread inside (or that might be only at fountain pens?

 

When were these kinds manufactured?

The pen has a black dot on its golden top, the pencil doesn't.

20251025_200521.jpg

20251025_200536.jpg

20251025_232723.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Liuna

    4

  • Chris1

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The black dot is to help you pick the right one when they are both clipped in your pocket and you can only see the ends of the caps; it saves you pulling the wrong one out. You have to remember that the ballpoint has the black dot though.

 

The caps simply pull off an inner metal tube.

 

This design has been made by Cross for ages and indeed was simply the Century until changes to the matching fountain pen and the introduction of the Century II led to the original design gaining the 'Classic' designation. The original Century fountain pen was lovely but could develop a fatal nib wobble that rendered it almost impossible to write with. I know of no cure for that, sadly.

 

There is a sticky thread here on Cross nomenclature as there can be a lot of confusion.

 

Cross used to have a wonderful repair service and lifetime guarantee but whether that is still the case I don't know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2025 at 12:32 PM, Chris1 said:

The black dot is to help you pick the right one when they are both clipped in your pocket and you can only see the ends of the caps; it saves you pulling the wrong one out. You have to remember that the ballpoint has the black dot though.

 

The caps simply pull off an inner metal tube.

 

This design has been made by Cross for ages and indeed was simply the Century until changes to the matching fountain pen and the introduction of the Century II led to the original design gaining the 'Classic' designation. The original Century fountain pen was lovely but could develop a fatal nib wobble that rendered it almost impossible to write with. I know of no cure for that, sadly.

 

There is a sticky thread here on Cross nomenclature as there can be a lot of confusion.

 

Cross used to have a wonderful repair service and lifetime guarantee but whether that is still the case I don't know. 

Thank you. 

I don't know much of them. I did realize the dot's function. 

Looking at ballpoint pens, are there differences between Century and Century II?

 

I also got a silver ballpoint, but it has some problems, I detailed them here:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if there are Century II ballpoints - sorry. The distinctive feature of the Century is the smoothness of the outline, as you see on your ballpoints. 

 

With the fountain pens, both the Century II and the Townsend have rings at the end of the cap to interupt the smooth outline that the (original) Century fountain pens had. 

 

I did see your post about the silver ballpoint but couldn't really work out what might be missing. If you hae the cap and barrel you might be able to work out what is missing by comparing what you have with the other black ballpoint. One option is to buy a cheap Cross Century ballpoint and cannibalise its workings to repair the silver one. But then you'd have other bits left over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2025 at 4:56 PM, Chris1 said:

I don't know if there are Century II ballpoints - sorry. The distinctive feature of the Century is the smoothness of the outline, as you see on your ballpoints. 

 

With the fountain pens, both the Century II and the Townsend have rings at the end of the cap to interupt the smooth outline that the (original) Century fountain pens had. 

 

I did see your post about the silver ballpoint but couldn't really work out what might be missing. If you hae the cap and barrel you might be able to work out what is missing by comparing what you have with the other black ballpoint. One option is to buy a cheap Cross Century ballpoint and cannibalise its workings to repair the silver one. But then you'd have other bits left over.

Which outline do you mean that you are referring to as being smooth?

Update: now I see what you mean, the middle ring is "poking out" as if it had a cap.

Now I wonder what the difference between Century and the newer Classic Century are, how can they be differentiated?

 

 

I rather have someone look at the silver one and if he can't help either, I'll try contacting the support at Cross. I'm not American though but Hungarian and there are no papers, got it from someone else (also the black ones). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other question is, if there are later made Cross Century Classic ballpoints and pencils too, can they be differentiated from the older Cross Centuries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35294
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30242
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...