Jump to content

Cross Peerless 125 Pocket Clip?


Tseg

Recommended Posts

Several years ago I bought a gold Cross Peerless 125.  Online, I noticed almost all pictures of this pen have a pocket clip with an embossed "Cross" on a black lacquered background.  Mine is an engraved "Cross".   I have seen a few examples of this online, but not many.  I have no concerns about authenticity (bought new), but was wondering if anyone has a back story about the pocket clip differences?

 

 

 

Cross Peerless 125.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tseg

    3

  • lascosas

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I sent an email into Cross and they responded there were no official public announcements about the clip style change, but their understanding is the non-lacquer/embossed clips were from an early run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got 12 Peerless: 10 FP, 2 BP.  All of mine are engraved except the Starwars FP and one of the BPs, which are embossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2025 at 2:52 PM, lascosas said:

I've got 12 Peerless: 10 FP, 2 BP.  All of mine are engraved except the Starwars FP and one of the BPs, which are embossed.

Interesting... 95%+ of all Peerless 125 pictures online show embossed with black lacquer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35286
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30199
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27737
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...