Jump to content

Help Identifying Vintage M-Series Pen


ViajeroOmega

Recommended Posts

I would like to request this Pelikan forum's help identifying the model of my newly inherited (but vintage) Pelikan fountain pen.  My uncle, the original owner, told me that it was a Souveran M600, but I noticed that it is about the same size as my own modern M800 (140mm in length), yet it has a 14kt bi-color gold and rhodium nib like the M600s do.   The cap ring has the inscription: "PELIKAN   W.-GERMANY" so I guess the pen was manufactured prior to October 3, 1990.  Any information would be much appreciated!

IMG_7686.jpg

IMG_7687.jpg

IMG_7679.jpg

IMG_7684-Edit.jpg

IMG_7682-Edit.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ViajeroOmega

    2

  • joss

    1

  • Bo Bo Olson

    1

  • stric75

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi,

14.0 mm is indeed the correct length for an M800, not for a M600. And the M800 initially came with a 14K nib (1987-89), from 1990 onwards it would have a 18K nib. 1987-89 also matches with the W-Germany imprint on the cap band. So what you have is an early M800.

 

Lots of info on this is can be found on the Pelikan-Colectibles website:

https://www.pelikan-collectibles.com/en/Pelikan/Models/Souveraen-Series/M800-Basis/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, joss said:

Hi,

14.0 mm is indeed the correct length for an M800, not for a M600. And the M800 initially came with a 14K nib (1987-89), from 1990 onwards it would have a 18K nib. 1987-89 also matches with the W-Germany imprint on the cap band. So what you have is an early M800.

 

Lots of info on this is can be found on the Pelikan-Colectibles website:

https://www.pelikan-collectibles.com/en/Pelikan/Models/Souveraen-Series/M800-Basis/index.html

 

Thank you very much Joss!   I suspected it was an M800, but the 14K nib did not fit the current M800 spec, so I did not know for sure..  Now I do thanks to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The W.Germany nibs are  very slightly more springy than the 91-97 nibs.

But one has to have both the '80-nibs and some 90's nibs to see the very slight difference.

 

I have lost somehere in my computer a pre Japanese nib era, nib chart. The 800 had it's very own and a narrower nib than the 400 nib.

Mine is a OM.

I do have a '91-97 400 in M....but doubt if I'll ever test both nibs, so will take other's word for it.

.....................

I do have a W.Germany small 600 tear drop  OBB, which is half a width narrower than my early 2000's 800 double ball OBB. So more than likely when the 800 went over to double ball, it was no longer made thinner than the 400/600.

The Reality Show is a riveting result of 23% being illiterate, and 60% reading at a 6th grade or lower level.

      Banker's bonuses caused all the inch problems, Metric cures.

Once a bartender, always a bartender.

The cheapest lessons are from those who learned expensive lessons. Ignorance is best for learning expensive lessons.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's a W. German or an early M800, it should have a golden colored medallion on the back of it's piston knob. Difficult to tell from the pics. But, yes, the older/early M800s did indeed have a very nice 14 carat nibs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35350
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30433
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...