Jump to content

"Transitional" 1960s Imperials?


gcliburn

Recommended Posts

I’ve seen a number of Sheaffer Imperial VIII Touchdown fillers with a puzzling (to me) mix of markings—specifically, cap and barrel marked “SHEAFFER” (all letters the same size) but 14k gold long-diamond inlaid nib marked “SHEAFFER’S” (two S’s larger than the other letters). I’m aware that “Sheaffer’s” became “Sheaffer” with the acquisition of the company by Textron in the mid 1960s. I’m also aware that pens in the Imperial form took on a bewildering variety of names and waffled back and forth between cartridge and Touchdown systems. Anyway, I wonder whether the mix of markings I’ve observed—almost always on Imperial VIII pens—is “transitional” rather than a result of swapping. Cap swapping I understand, but frequent swapping of earlier nib/section units into later cap/barrel combos seems unlikely. Sheaffer experts, what do you say? And if this is old news, I apologize for not finding an answer in my research so far. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • gcliburn

    2

  • joss

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

I am not sure whether it is old news but I have used that observation for a rough estimation of the production period of these pens. Period catalogs and advertisements show that the change from "SHEAFFER'S" to "SHEAFFER" happened around April 1964, together with the introduction of the new Sheaffer logo (the stylised S). There are 1963 (and earlier) Sheaffer ads showing an Imperial or PFM nib with "SHEAFFER'S" imprint while the Imperial nib in 1964 ads clearly has the "SHEAFFER" imprint. Textron acquired the Sheaffer pen company in March 1966.

 

I therefore regard an Imperial with "SHEAFFER'S" imprint on both the nib and the barrel as pre-1964.  I date Imperial pens with mixed imprints ("SHEAFFER'S" on nib and "SHEAFFER" on cap and barrel) as transitional from mid 1964 to possibly late 1966. An April 1964 Sheaffer catalog has the new logo and "Sheaffer" imprint on its front page but some pens and boxes shown in the catalog still have the "Sheaffer's" imprint. This is also seen sporadically in ads until late 1966. One can easily imagine that Sheaffer continued to mount 'older' nibs on the Imperial pens until stock was finished. The mixed imprints are also found on the Imperial II and III pens with the short Triumph wrap-around nib. I date Imperial pens with the "SHEAFFER" imprint on both the nib and barrel to mid 1966 or later but they could be a bit earlier also, it may depend on when the old stock nibs were finished. I guess that by the time that Sheaffer was acquired by Textron, there was a uniform SHEAFFER imprint on nib and barrel but that is just a guess.

 

Edited by joss
text added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33584
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26772
    5. jar
      jar
      26105
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...