Jump to content

Recommended Posts

(Originally posted over here.)

 

I was killing time in Kinokuniya last week, and came across a big pile of A5 notebooks priced at A$4.95 each. That's atypically low for paper products that Kinokuniya chooses to carry, to put it mildly; and these notebooks are not exactly thin, have covers of some material that is seems stiffer and more ‘premium’ than (kraft or other) paper or card, and weren't marked as clearance stock or otherwise discounted that I could see. Every book is sealed in a clear cellophane pocket with a resealable flap; and, being Kinokuniya, its staff were sure to additionally tape the flap down over the store's price sticker, which in turn sits on top of and obscures the human-readable information on the manufacturer's barcode sticker. On only some of the notebooks, which come in three different colourways, there are see-through stickers that describe the product features less-than-comprehensively thus:

Notebook

8 page index

numbered pages

 

100gsm

acid free paper

fountain pen fantastic

soft touch cover

 

Lined

 

without disclosing the actual page count, how far apart the ruled lines are, or where the product (or paper) was made.

 

The brand is MEMMO, which I have never heard of until then.

 

Between the incredibly low price and the claim of being “fountain pen fantastic”, I just could not contain my curiosity; and so I took one unit to the counter in the stationery department and asked for more information. The lady there didn't know; and so she offered to open one up to show me, which necessitated cutting the pocket along a seam with a knife, given the additional measures to ensure customers cannot easily unseal the retail packaging themselves (in-store or at home).

 

Each book has 150 numbered pages, and additionally 8 index pages titled Index 2017. (I have now looked inside all three colourways, and they are all stuck equally far in the past) Upon my drawing her attention to it, the lady remarked, “No wonder they're cheap.” The horizontal guidelines on regular pages are ruled 6mm apart; and there is space marked out, with virgules as field separators but no year number preprinted, in the outside-edge corner at the top for the date; so the format is perfectly usable with no distracting outdated markings. The paper itself does not look or feel coated, and the cover material is somewhat rubbery to the touch and stiffer than, say, a latex oven mitt. All nice enough features to raise its standing above the average notebook one'd find in the MUJI store downstairs or Officeworks across the road. The Internet domain name (which is not exactly a ‘web page’ or URL), memmo.com.au, printed on the top sheet alludes to the brand being Australian, but I cannot find any explicit statement of where the product was made or from where the paper was sourced.

 

All the same, it all seems too good to be true, so I just had to risk $5 (but be also mentally prepared to return to the store and buy $100 ‘worth’ of the remaining stock).

 

Well, it is too good to be true. The paper is not bad, but (very loosely speaking) there is visible bleed-through to the other side of the 100gsm sheet from eight or nine out of every ten inks I have tested, although not to the extent of being greatly distracting if there is handwritten text in front of the spots of ink bleed. There is also noticeable, albeit sparse, feathering with maybe half of the inks; and, by that, I mean ink travelling in awkward directions along fibres on the paper surface away from the ink marks, not woolly outlines. Lines of ink tend to spread more than on Rhodia, but may be on par with the recto side of Exacompta FAF 70g/m² paper.

 

If I'm to keep a journal or subject-specific notebook, in which I would typically write with several, or even many, different pens and different inks, I probably won't enjoy writing in this type of notebook, or subsequently rereading what I'd written. In terms of paper quality, I'd say it's on par with the 100gsm paper used in Paperblanks Flexis softcover journals. The Flexis paper is more apt to exhibit bleed-through, but more resistant to feathering; and it's off-white in colour, whereas the paper in this 2017 notebook is a cool white in spite of the coloured edges on three sides.

 

I've subsequently found that the aforementioned domain name, when used as a partial URL (absent the https:// protocol part), does not bring up a website of the same name; it redirects to the website of a different brand/company, although that company seems to sell some similar products (priced at A$19.95 each) of which the description does not match the details of this notebook exactly.

 

The website claims it is “fountain pen friendly” (as opposed to “fountain pen fantastic”). I'm not going to order one at that price to see if it uses the same paper, or is in fact the same product; but for now I strongly suspect it is the case, and just that the details listed are inaccurate in more ways than one and cannot be trusted.

 

large.2144243061_MemmoredirectstoIkonink.jpg.417dfd8047cb9a908084d6e9bd81e6b7.jpg

large.1964123754_Memmofpnotebookinso-calledblue-productpagevsactualitem.jpg.7145aaf8bb0758cc6fe53d6d71d74bd7.jpg

large.1546749552_Memmofpnotebookinblack-purple-productpagevsactualitem.jpg.b584ba492fbbee2a29fa3fa2d604ac74.jpg

 

large.1560901251_Overviewof4pagesofwritingsamplesonMemmofpnotebook(photo).jpg.957437073ad816a6d1113113ca8a4c00.jpg

 

large.412034824_Memmofpnotebookfeatheringcollage(300dpi).jpg.016030d196cce465be8a0105836bee37.jpg

 

large.1148226618_Page146ofMemmofpnotebook(120dpiscan).jpg.c96be38f1213fc5fa92985bcb12331e5.jpg

 

large.493004433_Page147ofMemmofpnotebook(120dpiscan).jpg.2d948f6c407f1d3feeeeca5282711191.jpg

 

large.1034763861_Page148ofMemmofpnotebook(120dpiscan).jpg.508192ad4ae5f06c6c46eb71ba8442c8.jpg

 

large.1958248712_Page149ofMemmofpnotebook(120dpiscan).jpg.a387c3136c6591c5fb6786ed7d7f6cd7.jpg

 

large.644127464_Page150ofMemmofpnotebook(120dpiscan).jpg.ba7a42f3fbc4af7b07fa8530aa0162f5.jpg

 

large.1225513579_RearblankpageinMemmofpnotebook(120dpiscan).jpg.328dee97e66b1c4b1bbac3ceef924283.jpg

 

So, being a sad, pathetic stationery junkie, what did I do mid-week? Return to Kinokuniya and buy another, of course, since the first book has been ‘ruined’ with my testing so far.

 

I won't use it for journalling — and I already have many dozen new Paperblanks and (better than that) Peter Pauper Press journals here anyway — but there is probably one particular application for which this MEMMO FP paper is suitable, in spite (or specifically because) of its minor flaws: an inking log book.

 

I'm not going to see which inks are more likely to produce feathering and bleed-through, if I keep using Apica notebooks or switch to Clairefontaine ‘Age Bag’ notebooks for my inking log book. On the other hand, keeping an inking log book on this flawed paper would not only tell me the colour of the ink, but also warn me which inks could spell trouble on inferior paper.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • A Smug Dill

    4

  • TitoThePencilPimp

    2

  • namrehsnoom

    1

I followed up with email (and a phone call a week later) to Ikonink, and this week they verbally confirmed that the MEMMO FP product in Kinokuniya is the same as what is listed and available to be ordered on the Ikonink website.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for this review, especially your idea of using a notebook with not-so-great paper as an ink log book. An excellent idea to get a feel for the way different inks behave on the less-than-optimal copy paper at the office. Thanks for that!

 

On a side note - I’ve had my eye on Peter Pauper Press journals as well. Do they compare favourably to Paperblanks? Haven’t tried one yet, because I’ve only found lined ones in local stores, and I always use journals with blank pages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, namrehsnoom said:

I’ve had my eye on Peter Pauper Press journals as well. Do they compare favourably to Paperblanks?

 

Yes, they do. I only have far more Paperblanks journals (which could be a mistake on my part) than Peter Pauper Press journals because the latter were rarely discounted by Amazon AU to the same ridiculous levels in that six-month stretch when I had my major buying spree; and I made the mistake of assuming that just because Paperblanks's 120gsm paper is good, its 100gsm paper would at least be comparable except for show-through (and generally Rhodia can do 80gsm paper with negligible show-through, I shouldn't worry).

 

I still have some PPP journal designs on my Amazon AU watchlist today.

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 10/29/2022 at 2:50 PM, A Smug Dill said:

 

Yes, they do. I only have far more Paperblanks journals (which could be a mistake on my part) than Peter Pauper Press journals because the latter were rarely discounted by Amazon AU to the same ridiculous levels in that six-month stretch when I had my major buying spree; and I made the mistake of assuming that just because Paperblanks's 120gsm paper is good, its 100gsm paper would at least be comparable except for show-through (and generally Rhodia can do 80gsm paper with negligible show-through, I shouldn't worry).

 

I still have some PPP journal designs on my Amazon AU watchlist today.

I seen a few paperblanks in store. Very nice covers, but the price was a bit high. Was wondering if they are fountain pen friendly? Ie., Japanese elf-m, western ef-m, with Pilot Iro/Sailor/Akkerman inks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TitoThePencilPimp said:

Was wondering if they are fountain pen friendly?

 

Its 120gsm paper is, in my experience.

 

I endeavour to be frank and truthful in what I write, show or otherwise present, when I relate my first-hand experiences that are not independently verifiable; and link to third-party content where I can, when I make a claim or refute a statement of fact in a thread. If there is something you can verify for yourself, I entreat you to do so, and judge for yourself what is right, correct, and valid. I may be wrong, and my position or say-so is no more authoritative and carries no more weight than anyone else's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, A Smug Dill said:

 

Its 120gsm paper is, in my experience.

 

good to know. will be purchasing the Maya Blue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33554
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26727
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...