Jump to content

EFNIR: Diamine Oxford Blue


LizEF

Recommended Posts

My only comment is that reviews are subject to the perceptions and preferences of the reviewer.

 

With that said, my perception is that Oxford Blue is an excellent bold ink, rich in colour, and an ink that stands out on a page; all of which I prefer in an ink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • LizEF

    18

  • ParramattaPaul

    4

  • IlikeInksandIcannotlie

    4

  • lapis

    2

Great review, thank you.

 

Guess I belong to the group that really loves this deep blue ink, it a great ink for business use, great contrast and readability. 

 

Use a lot in my cedar blue Parker 51 (broad nib), really like this combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PatrickA said:

Great review, thank you.

:) You're very welcome!

 

5 hours ago, PatrickA said:

Guess I belong to the group that really loves this deep blue ink, it a great ink for business use, great contrast and readability. 

 

Use a lot in my cedar blue Parker 51 (broad nib), really like this combination.

:) I'm glad - as I've said before, variety and diversity are two things I love about this community and the products available to it.  It's fabulous when folks find an ink they love - whatever ink that may be. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43972
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      35351
    3. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      30433
    4. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    5. Bo Bo Olson
      Bo Bo Olson
      27744
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • inkstainedruth
      Thanks for the info (I only used B&W film and learned to process that).   Boy -- the stuff I learn here!  Just continually astounded at the depth and breadth of knowledge in this community! Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth 
    • Ceilidh
    • Ceilidh
      >Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color,<   I'm sure they were, and my answer assumes that. It just wasn't likely to have been Kodachrome.  It would have been the films I referred to as "other color films." (Kodachrome is not a generic term for color film. It is a specific film that produces transparencies, or slides, by a process not used for any other film. There are other color trans
    • inkstainedruth
      @Ceilidh -- Well, I knew people who were photography majors in college, and I'm pretty sure that at least some of them were doing photos in color, not just B&W like I learned to process.  Whether they were doing the processing of the film themselves in one of the darkrooms, or sending their stuff out to be processed commercially?  That I don't actually know, but had always assumed that they were processing their own film. Ruth Morrisson aka inkstainedruth   ETA: And of course
    • jmccarty3
      Kodachrome 25 was the most accurate film for clinical photography and was used by dermatologists everywhere. I got magnificent results with a Nikon F2 and a MicroNikkor 60 mm lens, using a manually calibrated small flash on a bracket. I wish there were a filter called "Kodachrome 25 color balance" on my iPhone camera.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...