Jump to content

Parker Duofold Age and material


dicks390

Recommended Posts

Hello pen experts:

I recently acquired three Parker Duofolds.  Two are identified as a Junior and a Lady.  I am only showing the barrel and section on the third one as it did not come with a cap.  Here are my questions:

 

  1. Is the imprint shown on each the medium imprint or the giant imprint?
  2. What is the approximate age of each?
  3. Are these pens hard rubber or permanite?  I guess it depends on their age.  I tried the rubbing and smell test, and it was inconclusive to me.
  4. Is the barrel shown from a Senior or a Special?  It is .52 inches wide, and came with a Parker arrow nib, not shown which could have been a replacement.  The feed was not ribbed.

 

Thank you.

duo 3.jpg

duo two.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • dicks390

    3

  • joss

    1

  • shalitha33

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

16 hours ago, shalitha33 said:

I'm not expert on these :( so all i can do is point you to https://parkerpens.net/duofold.html there is an example of a pen with the giant imprint which you can compare to. there is also a size chart at the end of the page to decide between each of the duofold sizes. 

Thank you, but my eyes can't tell the difference re the imprints, and for the pen with only the barrel, I can't apply the measurements given, as they are for a complete pen with cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. the imprint on the three pens is not medium or giant but it is the "small" imprint, introduced circa 1924.

2. the pens are all pre-streamline so they are pre 1929.

3. try the rubbing & smell test also on the section, cap dome and blind cap just to be able to recognize the peculiar odor of hard rubber (the cap dome of the ringtop Lady Duofold may well be hard rubber). Red hard rubber Duofolds can have a rather dull orange appearance compared to the more shiny appearance of orange permanite. Red hard rubber is <1926, Permanite was introduced in mid 1926.

4. the length of that barrel (circa 110 mm) is correct for a Senior. The Special was imprinted as such on the barrel. The barrel diameter of the Special was 12 mm vs 13 mm for the Senior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, joss said:

1. the imprint on the three pens is not medium or giant but it is the "small" imprint, introduced circa 1924.

2. the pens are all pre-streamline so they are pre 1929.

3. try the rubbing & smell test also on the section, cap dome and blind cap just to be able to recognize the peculiar odor of hard rubber (the cap dome of the ringtop Lady Duofold may well be hard rubber). Red hard rubber Duofolds can have a rather dull orange appearance compared to the more shiny appearance of orange permanite. Red hard rubber is <1926, Permanite was introduced in mid 1926.

4. the length of that barrel (circa 110 mm) is correct for a Senior. The Special was imprinted as such on the barrel. The barrel diameter of the Special was 12 mm vs 13 mm for the Senior.

Thank you so much!  I sure was wrong on the imprint.   Tony Fishier indicates that the small imprint was introduced in 1926, so I guess all of the pens are permanite if he is correct.

 

Edited by dicks390
expand and correct
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Contributions

    1. amberleadavis
      amberleadavis
      43844
    2. PAKMAN
      PAKMAN
      33554
    3. Ghost Plane
      Ghost Plane
      28220
    4. inkstainedruth
      inkstainedruth
      26724
    5. jar
      jar
      26101
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Comments

    • Shanghai Knife Dude
      I have the Sailor Naginata and some fancy blade nibs coming after 2022 by a number of new workshop from China.  With all my respect, IMHO, they are all (bleep) in doing chinese characters.  Go use a bush, or at least a bush pen. 
    • A Smug Dill
      It is the reason why I'm so keen on the idea of a personal library — of pens, nibs, inks, paper products, etc. — and spent so much money, as well as time and effort, to “build” it for myself (because I can't simply remember everything, especially as I'm getting older fast) and my wife, so that we can “know”; and, instead of just disposing of what displeased us, or even just not good enough to be “given the time of day” against competition from >500 other pens and >500 other inks for our at
    • adamselene
      Agreed.  And I think it’s good to be aware of this early on and think about at the point of buying rather than rationalizing a purchase..
    • A Smug Dill
      Alas, one cannot know “good” without some idea of “bad” against which to contrast; and, as one of my former bosses (back when I was in my twenties) used to say, “on the scale of good to bad…”, it's a spectrum, not a dichotomy. Whereas subjectively acceptable (or tolerable) and unacceptable may well be a dichotomy to someone, and finding whether the threshold or cusp between them lies takes experiencing many degrees of less-than-ideal, especially if the decision is somehow influenced by factors o
    • adamselene
      I got my first real fountain pen on my 60th birthday and many hundreds of pens later I’ve often thought of what I should’ve known in the beginning. I have many pens, the majority of which have some objectionable feature. If they are too delicate, or can’t be posted, or they are too precious to face losing , still they are users, but only in very limited environments..  I have a big disliking for pens that have the cap jump into the air and fly off. I object to Pens that dry out, or leave blobs o
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More
  • Files






×
×
  • Create New...